being a huge stephen king fan i can say that the book is way better, there is a lot of story that they were unable to get into the film due to length and if u watch the film after reading the book then you realise how much has been missed out,
also most of the stephen king films which have been turned into films have been crap, ie tommyknockers/cujo/christine/thinner,
if there was ever a stephen book that needed to be turned into a seris of films its the GUNSLINGER/DARK TOWER series, they rock
Most of the movies based on King's stories are just pale compared to the books. The thing is that King pays much attention in describing the frustration and terror that goes on in his characters minds, something that is hard to translate to the screen.
And along with that, directors seem to focus on the easier-to-film scenario's of King's books, neglecting the more intriguing parts.
'It' is a good example. Decent movie, but nowhere near as horrific and detailed as the book. Not the mention the f*cked-up ending in the movie.
Of course the book is better than the movie, but does anyone really think that you can portray what goes on in Stephen Kings mind to Film? Pennywise is also mentioned in another book of his cant remember, either Dreamcatcher or Black House, I think dreamcatcher, and it is coming up on the anniversary of when It is supposed to come to feed.
Originally posted by hanxan
Of course the book is better than the movie, but does anyone really think that you can portray what goes on in Stephen Kings mind to Film? Pennywise is also mentioned in another book of his cant remember, either Dreamcatcher or Black House, I think dreamcatcher, and it is coming up on the anniversary of when It is supposed to come to feed.
King does that a lot. Characters from other stories often have a cameo in his books, or even have a influencial part at times.
But back to 'It'. If you liked the movie/series, you'll love the book. It is so much more detailed and explaining. And way more scary!