Re: Re: Re: Re: Wolverine runs the gauntlet:
Originally posted by Psyquis52
lol. I think you misunderstood me. I meant that it was a weak Gauntlet because Wolverine can't get past 4.
Not that 4 was weak. Wolverine is weak and this thread is weak because they have him paired against pretty much impossible odds.
Oh. 😄
Originally posted by jinzin
i support a character that people have more problems with than any other though PIS is evident in ALL comic characters.. and yes even to the degree that wolverine is, people only choose to bicker more about wolverine than other characters because they don't like him.. I support him using more consistent feats.. since PIS is based off of consistency in most cases well....I'm a fanboy because i choose to support a character using EVIDENCE THAT EXISTS (and usually in abundance)???? 🤨
I just don't follow that logic.
Consistency of Wolverine but not always of the character Wolverine faces.................thats where the PIS comes from. Not the fact that Wolverine has a great feat, its that when its a low showing for another character the Wolverine feat is supposed to be something to live by, not so much.
Classic example is Cyclops, he has shown over and over again his blasts are concussive and have a "throw back." He has used this on Wolverine to throw him back as well as other characters, a fairly typical showing of Cyclops. Along comes a Wolverine showing where he stands and takes a full shot of Cyclops blasts. Is that a typical Cyclops showing, no. However now its to be said Wolverine can take a full blast from Cyclops becuase of a crap low showing? No of course not, thats where the forum calls in PIS. Like it, love it, hate it whatever if you choose to constantly highlight "high" showings of one and "low" showings of another to illustrate, thats not logic and hence the fanboy title.
http://mrlcomics.com/wolverine_vol1_covers/wolverine_vol1_cover_138.jpg
One of the funniest covers for comics.
