Originally posted by PVS
there is no war on terrorism. that is just rhetoric for the "democratising" of middle eastern muslem nations. democratising is in quotes because how can anyone call whats in iraq 'democracy' and hold a straight face?
But you are not answering the question. Please do not derail this thread.
Originally posted by The Omega
It's a stupid question to be frank.
You can't wage a war on a CONCEPT fer petes sake. So you have to be more concrete in what it is you're asking.
Then look at it theoretically. I just don't want PVS turning this thread into a Bush bashing thread.
If you believe that nothing would happen, then state that.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then look at it theoretically. I just don't want PVS turning this thread into a Bush bashing thread.If you believe that nothing would happen, then state that.
Look, if there is no war on terrorism, and there isn't then obviously nothing would happen if it would stop since it doesn't exist....
Are you asking "What would happen if the US would not invade any more countries, withdraw from those it did already invade and stop the hunting, locking up and killing of "terrorists"?" ?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Look, if there is no war on terrorism, and there isn't then obviously nothing would happen if it would stop since it doesn't exist....Are you asking "What would happen if the US would not invade any more countries, withdraw from those it did already invade and stop the hunting, locking up and killing of "terrorists"?" ?
Yes, maybe even a step or two more. Like, what if the US army were destroyed, or a US city destroyed. I don't know I'm asking you.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then look at it theoretically. I just don't want PVS turning this thread into a Bush bashing thread.If you believe that nothing would happen, then state that.
What do you MEAN by ”loosing the war on terror?” What does that mean to you? What would it take for YOU to say "ok terror won" or "the war on terror is lost", or...