Best KMC Debators

Started by Alpha Centauri16 pages
Originally posted by kentyboy
That was my post dumbass. The only negative thing that I said about AC was that debaters in the SWVF would own him in a debate. I even went as far as saying he was reasonable smart.
However I was way more critical of Valharu and DarkC.

They'd own me in a debate how? By knowing more about Star Wars? Right on. I'll admit, I don't give a shit about Star Wars. What's your point? There's a reason most of them never step outside those forums.

-AC

Originally posted by Bardock42
Like that ever happened

never?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
They'd own me in a debate how? By knowing more about Star Wars? Right on. I'll admit, I don't give a shit about Star Wars. What's your point? There's a reason most of them never step outside those forums.

-AC

Janus, not even the best debater in the SWVF was able to own anybody in the philosophy forum. Check out his posts.

Originally posted by kentyboy
Janus, not even the best debater in the SWVF was able to own anybody in the philosophy forum. Check out his posts.

I disagree, Janus is alright, but he is in no way the debate god you make him out to be.

IKC was actually the best.

Originally posted by kentyboy
Janus, not even the best debater in the SWVF was able to own anybody in the philosophy forum. Check out his posts.
Owning is for arguements, not debate. You clearly have no clue what you're talking about.

AC without a doubt

Originally posted by kentyboy
Janus, not even the best debater in the SWVF was able to own anybody in the philosophy forum. Check out his posts.

I know who he is and I've encountered him before, he didn't own me, he didn't even come close. He's alright, I have no problem with him, but he's nothing special. Most people who get rated for their debate skills ironically get rated by people who are shit at debating. "Wow, I'm shit, and he's not shit, so he must be great.". Doesn't work that way.

So if it comes to Star Wars, yes I'd get "owned", if it makes you happy. I don't care. I've never been "owned" anywhere else for many reasons, one such being that you'd have to care to get owned.

That said, if you want to play to strengths, if you could somehow bring the entire SWVF to the Music forum for a set debate, we'd see what happens, but that's spamming.

-AC

Originally posted by PVS
never?

Yes, never.

You got owned by Deano in the sports forum, AC.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes, never.

really?

Originally posted by Mei Amor
Owning is for arguements, not debate. You clearly have no clue what you're talking about.

WTF? You're an idiot. Please explain how you formulated that belief.

Originally posted by PVS
really?

I value your input.

Originally posted by kentyboy
WTF? You're an idiot. Please explain how you formulated that belief.
Oh noes, you called me an idiot. 😐

Owning isn't for debates because debates are only proving a point and to 'own' someone you usually have to insult them (in the basest sense); that's always how it is in pretty much every forum htat has it in regular use. 👆

So, who are you a sock of?

...and well, being owned by someone in the SWVF is pretty insulting.

Not as insulting as being owned by Debbie though. 😛

Originally posted by kentyboy
WTF? You're an idiot. Please explain how you formulated that belief.

a debate is an exchange of ideas in search for a common truth. to "own" someone is to dominate them. THEM. not their point, not the issue, but them, ad hominem. if that is the case then its an argument/flame/battle/etc and not a debate. judging by your overuse of insults, i can see how you fail to grasp the difference.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I value your input.

do you?

Originally posted by Eis
Not as insulting as being owned by Debbie though. 😛

I refuse to admit being owned by debbie,. i reviewed my standpoint and it is still closer to the truth than anything debbiejo ever said.

Originally posted by Eis
Not as insulting as being owned by Debbie though. 😛
Heh.