Shin Akuma vs. Devil Jin

Shin Akuma

vs.

Devil Jin

double fireballs, teleport-like move, instant hell murder, misogi, etc...

if devil jin tries to fly away to the air and shoot at gouki, then all gouki has to do is misogi his ass down to the ground. not to mention it is that SAME move that killed bison. and if bison is a boss character and devil jin as well. chances are... misogi would probably kill him as well.

and misogi is alot stronger than raging demon gameplay wise.
not sure about storyline wise, probably not though.

Raging Demon is his most powerful move, and depends on the person. If that person has done great evil over his life the raging demon is going to f**king obliterate them. go too google and type in raging demon, it's unequal.

IMO, i think the only guy in SF universe that can beat Gouki is Oro himself.. because well... yeah you know what i mean if you actually played third strike..
that guy is... words cant describe him 🙁

Originally posted by looldude
IMO, i think the only guy in SF universe that can beat Gouki is Oro himself.. because well... yeah you know what i mean if you actually played third strike..
that guy is... words cant describe him 🙁

Oro is tight, I like playing him. But when Oro fought Akuma they werent at full potential, they where feeling each other out. Shin Akuma is another story faster, stronger, more powerful than his regulas self, I feel he would kill Oro. But we will nevet find out anytime soon, capcom better hurry up up SF 4.

why do Tekken lovers want sf to be eqeal to sf.

it is obvious this is not a match.

The top tier of sf is an whole diffent kind of level.
None from Tekken comes close to them.

Shin Akuma wins this with ease

Hands down!!

i'm going to have to agree with shin remy even though you do portray your self as a capcom fanboy.
however, i see nothing wrong with that if the game is compared to something else that is absolutely obvious. (who would win of course)

i think tekken should stick with virtue fighter/doa.

and capcom should stick with snk.

my sentiments exactly. SF has it's own range just as Tekken does. Instead, someone should post a thread about which is the better game and why. Not which is stronger.

Street Fighter3 third strike is better IMO

the comunity is stil big and alive

in tekken you have just have to bring you oponent in the air and you perform a chain of combo's. till youre dead. it is too easy.

Street Fighter 3 third strike goes waay deeper.
Daigo the best fighting game player in the world said it himself.

Street Fighter 3 Third Strike is the best figting game in the world. and i agree on him

Tekken franchise is better because unlike capcom namco gives a damn.
What I hate about tekken is that the damage is RIDICULES
And their fans can be annoying being a DOA fan I know that for a fact.

Originally posted by looldude
IMO, i think the only guy in SF universe that can beat Gouki is Oro himself.. because well... yeah you know what i mean if you actually played third strike..
that guy is... words cant describe him 🙁

What about Ingrid? =/

oh and btw, yes i agree that Tekken should stick to fight virtua fighter or D.O.A. (i like d.o.a. but i think the feeling when playing (d.o.a., Tekken, virtua fighter) is different that if you play sf3 3rd strike, it's another LV)

Shin Akuma

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Tekken franchise is better because unlike capcom namco gives a damn.
What I hate about tekken is that the damage is [B]RIDICULES
And their fans can be annoying being a DOA fan I know that for a fact. [/B]

Ur Talkin out of experience, huh Blue.