Grievous vs. Vader...Feats of Strength!

Originally posted by darthsith19
1. Grievous - he was strong enough to smash but a big dent in the wall of a starfighter. Vader may be equally as strong but he couldn't carry the weight as easily for as long because he'd get tired.
2. Grievous, I'd say. Snapping someone's neck with one hand is impressive, but smashing a starfighter hull is more so.
3. One one hand? Vader wins since Grievous isn't used to fighting with one hand and might have never done it before - Vader consistently fights one handed.

I agree with the same, and - I don't think that Grievous's one hand can overpower Vader's two.

Originally posted by Captain REX
The upper arm and shoulder he can strengthen with the Force, however. So, in addition to the tooled up lower arms being immensely strong, his upper arms are super-human in strength, as most Jedi can achieve.

grievous would probably win all of them.

1. grievous would be able to move faster and he wouldnt tire. vader would probably make it too but not as quickly.

2. grievous is supposedly 10 times stronger than a normal human in each arm (nonseperated), vaders big feat is lifting a guy up so lets say that takes 2 or 3 people to do. even with the force i dont think vader wins this, he could probably match grievous in grip, but the rest is done with organic muscle.

3. its not an actual fight, just both of them hammering at eachother using nothing but strength (as i understand it anyway). so grievous is stronger, and doesnt tire, he takes this also.

Grievous!

Vader would own his every time

1.) Grievous
2.) Grievous
3.) Vader