Dan Jurgens wrote:"It's my opinion that Reed Richards is one of two or three inventors in the world who is capable of inventing a device that can "cut through" (more likely rearrange the molecular density of) adamantium.
At the same time, please realize that Franklin is given to hyperbolic statements about his parents' achievements, as are almost all kids of that age."
Dan
Re: Re: Re: Superman vs Adamantium- which is more durable?
Originally posted by Dalak
Too bad Crossovers aren't considered Canon.
No Non-canon Sources
A canon source is one that is regarded as being 'in continuity'. In the example of Star Trek; instances from the series and movies can be used, but books are definitely out. Comic book crossovers are usually unusable as they ignore common sense most of the time (DC vs. Marvel is certainly unusable in some cases in our debates!).
Depends... forums rules say nothing about them being banned if you read carefully. It leaves things open to interpretation.
Originally posted by Silent Master
How did he flip flop?
Dan Jurgens wrote:"It's my opinion that Reed Richards is one of two or three inventors in the world who is capable of inventing a device that can "cut through" (more likely rearrange the molecular density of) adamantium.
First he says that Reeds is capable of inventing the device.
At the same time, please realize that Franklin is given to hyperbolic statements about his parents' achievements, as are almost all kids of that age."
Then he says Franklin may be exaggerating.
Originally posted by Silent Master
For that to be a flip flop he would have had to say that the beam that hit Superman could cut through adamantium, you'll notice he never said that.
He didn't say that it couldn't and he also gave reeds props that he could invent the device.
Dan went the safest route and chose his words very carefully.
And nowhere in his carefully picked words did he say that Reed ever built such a laser or that Superman was hit by one, what he did say was that Franklin was prone to hyperbole, that gives us every reason to doubt Franklin's statement and zero reason to accept it as truth.
Plus that comic isn't canon.
Originally posted by Silent Master
And nowhere in his carefully picked words did he say that Reed ever built such a laser or that Superman was hit by one, what he did say was that Franklin was prone to hyperbole, that gives us every reason to doubt Franklin's statement and zero reason to accept it as truth.
Right. Read it again... basically it's "he's capable or building one, but his son is also capable of exaggerating." Flip flop answer.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Plus that comic isn't canon.
Never said that it was.
Originally posted by Avalonofthewind
This is the closest we may get to an answer.
Superman>>Adamantium
I have other reasons in believing he is, but thought I'd share the scan anyway.