The Official KMC Member Banned Thread

Started by Bardock42278 pages
Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Marius, I don't really care. I'm sure that the mods for the most part don't just run around banning people for nothing. Maybe they do. Regardless, they are here to do what Raz asked them to do, and that's that.

Scott, decisions of any kind are open to discussion, if you support it (alright), just don't come in here like Eclipso and tell me that "it was right to ban him cause how could a mod be wrong?"

That is insane, what do we have rules for then anyways, if no one can be sure what happenes whether one breaks them or doesn't?

Originally posted by InnerRise
Yes. Definitely. A very specific member comes to mind but will remain nameless because I don't do that anymore.

*cough*

Spoiler:
Nah, I won't do it.
*cough*

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Turned over a new leaf did you?

Well I agree and naming isn't going to make it go away.

Smiter created a thread that's sole purpose was to bash people.

How is that not bashing?

There's a good reason why threads like the ones he made are not allowed, because they're nothing but flamebait.

Smiter deserved to be banned in every sense of the word.

He set out to ruin Vinny's thread in the philosophy form. He then made a mock copy of the thread. When that failed he made a thread to make a joke out of it.

He then posted let's just say "questionable" images.

He then made a list directly bashing members.

The guy got what he deserved.

Originally posted by Eclipso
Smiter deserved to be banned in every sense of the word.

He set out to ruin Vinny's thread in the philosophy form. He then made a mock copy of the thread. When that failed he made a thread to make a joke out of it.

He then posted let's just say "questionable" images.

He then made a list directly bashing members.

The guy got what he deserved.


Nonsense, Smiter posted once in Vinny's Emo thread. He made a satirical copy, absolutely acceptable.

He did not bash members, you being a crybaby is not a bash. For different reasons.

Wrong.

Here we go AGAIN with Vinny's Cancelled Thread. 😴

I checked that thread and Smiter did nothing wrong in that thread.

His one little post did nothing to that thread.

How long do we have to read your complaints about VINNY'S THREAD??

Which isn't YOURS by the way.

anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Scott, decisions of any kind are open to discussion, if you support it (alright), just don't come in here like Eclipso and tell me that "it was right to ban him cause how could a mod be wrong?"

That is insane, what do we have rules for then anyways, if no one can be sure what happenes whether one breaks them or doesn't?

Marius, once more, like our PM discussions, I'm not saying that mods don't make mistakes, what I'm saying is that ALL of us are supposed to know the rules, and if they determine the rules have been broken, they ban. I'm seriously not going to worry about the repercussions of 'banning without just cause' on a message board. srug

Well thats your opinion but a great number of members and mods seems to feel he deserved it.

Bardock, no offense ment. But what exactly do you feel a person has to do to deserve banning?

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
Marius, once more, like our PM discussions, I'm not saying that mods don't make mistakes, what I'm saying is that ALL of us are supposed to know the rules, and if they determine the rules have been broken, they ban. I'm seriously not going to worry about the repercussions of 'banning without jsut cause' on a message board. srug

Good, then what is your argument here? You don't worry about it, good job, I am happy for you, can we now go on to discuss the bannings in "The Official KMC Member Banned Thread" ?

Originally posted by Eclipso
Smiter deserved to be banned in every sense of the word.

**** off loser

Originally posted by Eclipso
He set out to ruin Vinny's thread in the philosophy form. He then made a mock copy of the thread. When that failed he made a thread to make a joke out of it.

Vinny insulted him first, Vinny also has insulted me on occasion without reason. Vinny is not the "nice old guy" everyone thinks he is...he will occasionally insult people for no reason, and then go back to being "friendly" again.

He shouldn't get special treatment....

Originally posted by Eclipso
He then posted let's just say "questionable" images.

Your a crybaby whining over lesbian kissing videos....go back to church and shut up

Originally posted by Eclipso
He then made a list directly bashing members.

He bashed no one...he was joking....

people like PVS and Marcello, bash members all the time, and they weren't banned for it

Originally posted by Eclipso
The guy got what he deserved.

You seriously need a life.....

I never reported his videos and that wasn't what I was talking about. And more then one member felt he was bashing them. Just because you like someone personaly doesn't mean they should be exempt from banning.

Originally posted by Eclipso
Well thats your opinion but a great number of members and mods seems to feel he deserved it.

Bardock, no offense ment. But what exactly do you feel a person has to do to deserve banning?

Maybe. No matter I provide reasons why I don't, if they disagree that is fine with me.

Attack someone constantly without a cause. Like saying someone is a crybaby is not an attack, it's an opinion. Calling them an ******* constantly is. Also saying someone is stupid is not an attack.

I think its kinda ironic that a few of you might get banned in The Official KMC Member Banned Thread.hmm

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
**** off loser

people like PVS and Marcello, bash members all the time, and they weren't banned for it

You seriously need a life.....

Calm down LU.

For the record, I banned PVS twice for member bashing.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Good, then what is your argument here? You don't worry about it, good job, I am happy for you, can we now go on to discuss the bannings in "The Official KMC Member Banned Thread" ?

I never had an argument with anyone in the first place, all I said was that it's not a big deal he got banned.

I have to question though, why people are acting like this is some civil rights issue, when, in reality, it's a discussion about someone being told that they can't type messages to other people on their computer for a few days.

Originally posted by LethalFemme
I think its kinda ironic that a few of you might get banned in The Official KMC Member Banned Thread.hmm

I can see the irony. Doubt it will happen though. Maybe LU...he deserves it though...generally.

Originally posted by LethalFemme
I think

vin

Originally posted by Bardock42
Maybe. No matter I provide reasons why I don't, if they disagree that is fine with me.

Attack someone constantly without a cause. Like saying someone is a crybaby is not an attack, it's an opinion. Calling them an ******* constantly is. Also saying someone is stupid is not an attack.

Well openly insulting someone to me would fit the definiton of "bashing".

If Smiter PM'd me and called me that I'm nto sure he would've been banned, it's more the fact I think that he did it openly and knew it was going to start a fight.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Calm down LU.

For the record, I banned PVS twice for member bashing.

I'm sorry, then I take back what I said droolio

And I was also wrong, Marcello was banned by Backfire..

Originally posted by ~Da Moose~
I never had an argument with anyone in the first place, all I said was that it's not a big deal he got banned.

I have to question though, why people are acting like this is some civil rights issue, when, in reality, it's a discussion about someone being told that they can't type messages to other people on their computer for a few days.

Aha

I say it's a big deal, if it's not a big deal why contribute about it in the first place?

Because it is the same thing basically. I would like to convince some people to take it easier on KMC...also to be fair. I would enjoy that, think that KMC would be a better place then. And others want the people they don't like to be banned while their friends shouldn't be...which I find hypocritical.