The Official KMC Member Banned Thread

Started by Phucked Up278 pages

I wish that mods wouldn't be so lenient on older members...in the old day you'd get 3 warnings, a temp ban, then if you act up again you get perma-banned cause you've had so many chances. Members like AC have been warned and banned numerous times but still allowed to come back.

there should always be both.

Sometimes people just get a little out of hand out of the blue.

And some people are just idiots. Like InnerRise.

I think there should be perma bans only, in addition to several warnings.

Originally posted by Phucked Up
I wish that mods wouldn't be so lenient on older members...in the old day you'd get 3 warnings, a temp ban, then if you act up again you get perma-banned cause you've had so many chances. Members like AC have been warned and banned numerous times but still allowed to come back.

Well said.

Originally posted by Selphie
there should always be both.

Sometimes people just get a little out of hand out of the blue.

And some people are just idiots. Like InnerRise.

haermm

And yeah...

I'm of the opinion that the ban, temporary or permanent, should fit the severity of the offense.

Originally posted by Impediment
I'm of the opinion that the ban, temporary or permanent, should fit the severity of the offense.
I disagree, I think bans should always be 3.5 times as severe as the offense.

It depends on what they do really. Instead of warnings, just make the temp ban longer... start off with 3 days, next offense would be... a week?

then a month?

then foreversss

Originally posted by Bardock42
I disagree, I think bans should always be 3.5 times as severe as the offense.

3.5?!? You animal, you.

Originally posted by Phucked Up
I wish that mods wouldn't be so lenient on older members...in the old day you'd get 3 warnings, a temp ban, then if you act up again you get perma-banned cause you've had so many chances. Members like AC have been warned and banned numerous times but still allowed to come back.
I missed that. 👆

Originally posted by Impediment
3.5?!? You animal, you.

I know, man. I can't believe the shit I posted today, I must have had a sarcasm clown for breakfast.

I think this place would suck without -AC. I find his contribution to the frustration of others as amusing.

we would survive....we would survive...hey ey.....

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
I think this place would suck without -AC. I find his contribution to the frustration of others as amusing.
Agreed. I enjoy AC as a poster from time to time.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
I think this place would suck without -AC. I find his contribution to the frustration of others as amusing.

I've learned to take A.C. with a grain of salt. Sure he can be a little infuriating at times, but we all need a loveable @$$hole in our lives, don't we?

I don't think he is an ******* actually. Just think he is very obsessive and quite arrogant.

Originally posted by Impediment
I've learned to take A.C. with a grain of salt. Sure he can be a little infuriating at times, but we all need a loveable @$$hole in our lives, don't we?

Very true.

Originally posted by Mairuzu
Its pretty annoying yes, but not worth a perma ban

Ax3l wasn't permanently banned. FFS, it says right in the profile why they were banned and for how long.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't think he is an ******* actually. Just think he is very obsessive and quite arrogant.

He said "loveable" *******.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
He said "loveable" *******.
Yeah, the way I see it that somehow includes ******* in some sort of manner.