Originally posted by dadudemon
Are the GDFers superior, in your opinion, in intellect than the average OTF attendee? In other words, you enjoy the conversations better in the GDF because they are more intellectually stimulating for you?
On average, yes.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Is that factual. 😊
It certainly is for some of you. Others I might not take a bet on it. Though, if you want to recreate the "Idiot - IQ dependant or not" conversation we had, just reread it, you were wrong.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Nor did I claim that someone was. I claimed the opposite, actually. 🙂
Y-yes. I told you that i never said though nor believed someone did, in relation to what you said. Thought that was obvious.
Originally posted by dadudemon
That was neither stated nor contextually implied in my post. doped
S-so? I didn't say you said it, just get over yourself. If I give you an information about my feelings, it doesn't need to be in relation to what you claimed.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Lies. You saidGranted, we all know who you meant by "you people". I'm just being a jerk. doped
I didn't qualify whether the guys addressed in those posts were the same (obviously they were not)...so your nit picking is quit pointless.
Originally posted by dadudemon
We both know you're racist. 😐
k
Originally posted by dadudemon
Dealt with. naughty
In the usual, foolish and bizarre dadudemoron fashion.
The thread at least got a bit more interesting, though, I suppose, there were too few banned members lately. At least, the threeway cybering between mindless OTFers is over.
Originally posted by Bardock42
On average, yes.
So, in turn, do you not think that others come into and discuss things for their own form of "stimulation"? In other words, to each his own. You can come in here and call people idiots if you want to. That much is obvious. (Though you may earn yourself a ban.) However, closed minded opinions cannot be passed off as being correct, as you like to do.
And before you say it, I know you never said it and you didn't imply it and I'm wrong. Great. Now that we are past that, we don't have to argue it for 3 pages. (Despite the fact we both know that I'm right and you'll argue it for the sake of arguing it.)
For some odd reason, you get away with more bannable bashing than most. hmm I guess you get your money's worth with your knee pads.
Originally posted by Bardock42
It certainly is for some of you. Others I might not take a bet on it. Though, if you want to recreate the "Idiot - IQ dependant or not" conversation we had, just reread it, you were wrong.
The "IQ" portion of that argument was incidental to the actual argument that you tried to pass your opinion off as factual. You seem to forget that. You seem to think you won that debate based on a sub-topic of that argument. Regardless, you were wrong to pass your opinion off as factual...THAT was the point of that debate. Unfortunately, your perspective of that discussion was erroneously interpreted so we have you prancing around with a faulty pretense of our discussion.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Y-yes. I told you that i never said though nor believed someone did, in relation to what you said. Thought that was obvious.
It was quite obvious. Unnecessary, actually. Maybe you hoped that we would end up arguing that point based on my erroneous interpretations or "straw man"s of that argument? Regardless, it is a moot point...we both agree that it was obvious and therefore it was unnecessary.
Originally posted by Bardock42
S-so? I didn't say you said it, just get over yourself..
That was unnecessary.
Originally posted by Bardock42
If I give you an information about my feelings, it doesn't need to be in relation to what you claimed.
I never said that you said I said it, now did I? "Get over yourself", my comments don't always have to be directly about you.
Originally posted by Bardock42
I didn't qualify whether the guys addressed in those posts were the same (obviously they were not)...so your nit picking is quit pointless.
Wow, thanks for stating what I've already pointed out that you would have pointed out. Kind of redundant, don't you think? You did say "all you people", which is not "some of you people" regardless of your contextual intentions, it was a contradiction at face value. You can't pretend you didn't post "all you people" when you did post it. Again, this is regardless of future qualifications.
Originally posted by Bardock42
In the usual, foolish and bizarre dadudemoron fashion.
Which is your bannable way of saying that you didn't expect that to happen.
Originally posted by Bardock42
The thread at least got a bit more interesting, though, I suppose, there were too few banned members lately. At least, the threeway cybering between mindless OTFers is over.
It will never end. Such is the nature of the OTF.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So, in turn, do you not think that others come into and discuss things for their own form of "stimulation"? In other words, to each his own. You can come in here and call people idiots if you want to. That much is obvious. (Though you may earn yourself a ban.) However, closed minded opinions cannot be passed off as being correct, as you like to do.And before you say it, I know you never said it and you didn't imply it and I'm wrong. Great. Now that we are past that, we don't have to argue it for 3 pages. (Despite the fact we both know that I'm right and you'll argue it for the sake of arguing it.)
For some odd reason, you get away with more bannable bashing than most. hmm I guess you get your money's worth with your knee pads.
The "IQ" portion of that argument was incidental to the actual argument that you tried to pass your opinion off as factual. You seem to forget that. You seem to think you won that debate based on a sub-topic of that argument. Regardless, you were wrong to pass your opinion off as factual...THAT was the point of that debate. Unfortunately, your perspective of that discussion was erroneously interpreted so we have you prancing around with a faulty pretense of our discussion.
It was quite obvious. Unnecessary, actually. Maybe you hoped that we would end up arguing that point based on my erroneous interpretations or "straw man"s of that argument? Regardless, it is a moot point...we both agree that it was obvious and therefore it was unnecessary.
That was unnecessary.
I never said that you said I said it, now did I? "Get over yourself", my comments don't always have to be directly about you.
Wow, thanks for stating what I've already pointed out that you would have pointed out. Kind of redundant, don't you think? You did say "all you people", which is not "some of you people" regardless of your contextual intentions, it was a contradiction at face value. You can't pretend you didn't post "all you people" when you did post it. Again, this is regardless of future qualifications.
Which is your bannable way of saying that you didn't expect that to happen.
It will never end. Such is the nature of the OTF.
Wow, your endless bunch of nonsense is awe-inspiring. Most of what you said has no relation to what I said or is just made up nonsense, I am not interested in exposing you of being a fool once more. Maybe someone else will, but it should be apparent anyways.
TeeHee....
Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
I wonder if Bardock realises Dadudemon is just trying to fvck with him? mmm
He PMed me. I assume that much, usually, though, I am pretty sure that, sadly, he does believe some (if not all) of the nonsense he spouts. The problem I have with him is not that he is unintelligent, it is his extremely narcissistic and sometimes very stubborn, blind and irrational behaviour, which granted, might be partly an act.
Originally posted by Bardock42
He PMed me. I assume that much, usually, though, I am pretty sure that, sadly, he does believe some (if not all) of the nonsense he spouts. The problem I have with him is not that he is unintelligent, it is his extremely narcissistic and sometimes very stubborn, blind and irrational behaviour, which granted, might be partly an act.
he's also an idiot and a liar. on a positive note........he's a snappy dresser