Oh lord.. Not this instakill debate..I'm going to guess none of you have read SW books and just going by sheer instinct or wikipedia. Since when is Luke able to just use it anytime he wants? By that logic Kun would have used his amulet 24/7, Sidious would have used his force storm 24/7, etc. It doesn't work that way. Sadow has shown feats that are on par with Luke, and some that are more impressive to show his dark side mastery. Luke has shown feats far more impressive than Sadow as well. You have Yoda who is the weak link here so either sith lord will take him out and together Luke can't match the raw power and force abilities of Sadow and Kressh.
Killiks are powerful force users? Sadow ripped out the core of the sun using his sith magic. "Oh but it was the ship". Way to downplay his power. Sadow was also the second most powerful of the ancient sith behind Ragnos. You're arguing that because Sadow didn't show to have fought jedi, then he can't? Absence of proof isn't proof of absence.
WTF! Because he used it once he can never do it again? THat's very poor logic. Luke wasn't exactly, "Zomg WOWz I made a cool attack, I will never do it again", he was quite calm while he did it, he knew what he did. Kun did use his amulet again, but he never faced a threat big enough for him to use it 24/7. Sidious has shown to be able to use a force storm whenever he wants to, he just didn't always do it.
And it was Sadow's ship that made the stars go supernova.
And you're missing the point. You're thinking Luke can insta kill just anybody, including powerful force users and sith alchemists. While I'm saying Sadow could just as well use his amulet on Luke as fast as Luke can use his instakill on Sadow. AKA not a very good argument considering their decisive force powers are rather inconclusive.
Where are these sources? Oh wait, just like your "Anderson" source! Oh yea we've never seen it. Yoda wouldn't be able to contend with mostly anyone from the ancient times, but your hatred for anything other than the new SW is evident. Sorry, no evidence=loss.
Oh yea, and Sadow CREATED this "weapon" lol.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Where are these sources? Oh wait, just like your "Anderson" source! Oh yea we've never seen it. Yoda wouldn't be able to contend with mostly anyone from the ancient times, but your hatred for anything other than the new SW is evident. Sorry, no evidence=loss.Oh yea, and Sadow CREATED this "weapon" lol.
Lol, actually it is the ancient sith that lack evidence. And when it has been stated by the one WHO MADE THAT SCENE WITH SADOW, I think it pretty much overrules what YOU think happened....
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Kamikz I never said he couldn't do it again, I said its foolish to think that he would do it 24/7.
Uh no. To quote you....
" lord.. Not this instakill debate..I'm going to guess none of you have read SW books and just going by sheer instinct or wikipedia. Since when is Luke able to just use it anytime he wants"
Yes, that means "Since when can luke use it 24/7" lol. That isn't an ambiguous statement, it is easy to understand. And again you keep talking about all this proof about Anderson, yet you can't provide a valid quote. That's like me saying "the ferrari is better than the lambhorgini, trust me". Provide a quote or don't use that as an argument as it serves no purpose.