hey i asked for this tread to be closed cause its one side'ed
(it dont bother me cause after the arguing ill admit to blade winning meaning their is nomore argument. its just that its a super one sided fight and not nearly enough feats on michaels behalf so this would go to blade through the showings of them.)
Originally posted by The Pict
my own original point is these vampires are less powerful than the blade ones, as they lack regeneration of limbs and such, so far as we have seen. if they were more like the ones from myth they would be more powerful.
but i gotta go to work see you.
see ya i got to go to bed.
Originally posted by rotiart
I'm not saying Michael's powerset isn't amazing... but in comics.. guys like captain america with skill... and not powers.. beat guys like hyde, power man, and even occasionally Thor.Blade has the speed and strength of a vampire. None of their weaknesses. And he's a horribly great fighter. He'll pummel the hell out of michael and never get hit in the process.
I agree. although with some training Michael would be damn near unbeatable because some of the stuff he was doing in the second movie was astonishing.
Michael in the first movie was able to threw Victor through a concrete wall like 1foot and half/2foot thick, without effort, and his lack of fighting skills was his only disadvantage, cause his brutal strength, and animal attitude maked him a raging unstoppable beat.
He got considerable speed and reflexes, and in U:Evolution he fought William, the elder Werewolf, who certainly is not a master of hand to hand fight, but was damn strong, it took a dozen of vampires with those chains to keep him at bay.And Michael just came back from death, he was dead guys, and ended the fight broking in two pieces William's head.Not a master of fighting skills, but wanna speak about brute strength?Blade will fight an enemy similar to Drake of the 3rd movie, cause while he has the skills he can't arm at all Mike, unless he behead him.