I'm actually enjoying the story though. Apart from Logan's healing factor (and possibly jobber aura) soaring to new heights, the rest of it has been very enjoyable IMO. Much better than what we're getting over in Origins.
And seriously, i think what we'll see is Logan beating SHIELD's elite Super Human Restraint Unit all over the place, and finally SHIELD will send in Sentry and he'll beat Logan down in one panel. Much like he did to Iron Man recently.
If it doesn't go down like that, then something is seriously wrong.
Originally posted by Lucid Luiif sentry doesnt beat wolves then thats some ****ed up shit.
I'm actually enjoying the story though. Apart from Logan's healing factor (and possibly jobber aura) soaring to new heights, the rest of it has been very enjoyable IMO. Much better than what we're getting over in Origins.And seriously, i think what we'll see is Logan beating SHIELD's elite Super Human Restraint Unit all over the place, and finally SHIELD will send in Sentry and he'll beat Logan down in one panel. Much like he did to Iron Man recently.
If it doesn't go down like that, then something is seriously wrong.
This is really more of an editorial slip-up than the writer, I think.
Sure Guggenheim, wrote the script and blew Wolverine's healing out of proportion, but over in Way's Origins--meh--Wolverine's healing hasn't been played down a little bit, more in line with how it was when he was introduced. He heals fast, but not instantenously, he's not godly.
The disparity between how the same character is being handled in those two series is ridiculous, someone needs to be coordinating shit better.
Originally posted by ScarletSpider
This is really more of an editorial slip-up than the writer, I think.Sure Guggenheim, wrote the script and blew Wolverine's healing out of proportion, but over in Way's Origins--meh--Wolverine's healing hasn't been played down a little bit, more in line with how it was when he was introduced. He heals fast, but not instantenously, he's not godly.
The disparity between how the same character is being handled in those two series is ridiculous, someone needs to be coordinating shit better.
I agree. Origins may not have the best stories (so I've heard, I've yet to read it) but from what I've heard the Wolverine in that one is more akin to regular Wolverine than the god-erine we've been seeing in the last couple of Wolverine issues. The editors really need to do better
Originally posted by ScarletSpider
This is really more of an editorial slip-up than the writer, I think.Sure Guggenheim, wrote the script and blew Wolverine's healing out of proportion, but over in Way's Origins--meh--Wolverine's healing hasn't been played down a little bit, more in line with how it was when he was introduced. He heals fast, but not instantenously, he's not godly.
The disparity between how the same character is being handled in those two series is ridiculous, someone needs to be coordinating shit better.
When Wolverine was first introduced he didn't have a healing factor. He was a member of Uncanny for years with out it ever being stated what his mutant ability was he just appeared to have an unknown degree of superhuman strength and insanely superhuman durability... even then he was much more impressive then current Wolverine is in Origins.
Anyway Way set some back ground for Wolverine: Origins when he was writing the normal Wolverine title. This Wolverine's healing factor is supposed to be in a slump since he has been going none stop since House of M with out any rest and very little food. And dont forget Way is the guy who wrote Venom series... I think we all remember that.
Originally posted by marvelprince
I agree. Origins may not have the best stories (so I've heard, I've yet to read it) but from what I've heard the Wolverine in that one is more akin to regular Wolverine than the god-erine we've been seeing in the last couple of Wolverine issues. The editors really need to do better
It's not the writing thats so bad , it could be MUCH better (Ie if they had Millar on the title) but it's the art which makes you want to tear the book in half , it's so stiff and unfeeling it's like comparing a cow in a field to a slab of beef on my plate.
Originally posted by grey fox
It's not the writing thats so bad , it could be MUCH better (Ie if they had Millar on the title) but it's the art which makes you want to tear the book in half , it's so stiff and unfeeling it's like comparing a cow in a field to a slab of beef on my plate.
