How's this for a poor debating tactic? During a "discussion" if Hawthorne Heights was metal or not someone asked a genre related question on the genre labels of some bands. Here was my reply:
Now, this isn't my domain, but here's my impression.
Radiohead is probably Avant-Garde Alternative Rock (AC, I swear to God, if you try to bash me for using Avant-Garde as a label... seriosuly, I know what I'm doing)
RATM is probably a blend of Rap(core?), Funk-oriented Metal, and Hard Rock.
The Smiths, I'd say are Alternative Pop Rock.
That's at least my impression of their styles.
And Alpha Centauri, who I was having the debate with tried to use that to insult my intelligence with:
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Rapcore, Rage Against the Machine, rapcore. Never heard a funnier, more credibility-erasing comment in my life. You seriously just started adding words onto the ends of genres, you even put a question mark next to "'core", see? You don't even know why you're using it.
You just set a new standard there. What a pretentious, wannabe know-nothing you are. "I know what I'm doing", actually the funniest thing I've read today.
But I forgive your cockyness, AC. ✅
Peace.
Re: Idiotic Debating Tactics
Originally posted by PVS
what are the stupidest tactics for debating you have seen?
[b]no names please, just state it, and if giving an example do not paste a debate from another thread. just give a hypothetical example.
i guess this is far too difficult a concept for one to grasp.......