Originally posted by sithsaber408
A whole new thread just for Me???ZOMGLOL11111
Well, I would just like to thank the academy for even nominating me, but I can't forget AC, PVS, Bardock, Styletime, Siegmund Freud, Charles Darwin, Hillary Clinton, Tom Gavin, and of course, that fanaticaly FAB-u-LOUS friend to all... Captain Fantastic.
Please take a moment to visit my sponsors: www.dictionary.com
😐
Save the whales and the trees!
Kill the babies and the old people!(brought to you by natural-born homosexuals from genetic soups and piles of mud)
paid for by the baby Jesus.TM
You forgot to post a picture of yourself with your girlfriend...which no one gives a shit about.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Hahaha, is that the 'cool' couple who were virgins - and proud of it - before they got married?I love it when people boast about sexual prowess.
Well, in his defense, I thought the post was humorus. Humorus like a bible thumping tumor. However, my only objection is the use of fabulous to describe me. I mean, don't you think Fantastic is enough. To use both is redundant. Like repeating bible verse.
Had to post another one.
Those people that want evidence for every little statement.
e.g.
"Could you give me some references for this Gravity you speak of"
There are some things that are fact. The reference is, at times, too lengthy to fully place references on a post. Also a partial reference list will not always satisfactorily show evidence of something. I did a few literature reviews on subjects that are fact that took a huge amount of bibliography space.
Originally posted by Regret
Had to post another one.Those people that want evidence for every little statement.
e.g.
"Could you give me some references for this Gravity you speak of"
There are some things that are fact. The reference is, at times, too lengthy to fully place references on a post. Also a partial reference list will not always satisfactorily show evidence of something. I did a few literature reviews on subjects that are fact that took a huge amount of bibliography space.
You don't know it is fact for sure.
Originally posted by BackFire
I would if she was naked.
You'd shit on her if she was naked? I don't think that's in the Bible.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, in his defense, I thought the post was humorus. Humorus like a bible thumping tumor.
Is that a typo? Did you mean to type 'humous? In that it'll have the consistency of toothpaste and leave you with bad breath in the morning?
Another one I'm seeing a lot of lately, is the MISuse of logical fallcies. These ****ing things are popular lately. And you can tell most of the people who bring them up just typed in "logical fallacy" into google and searched one of the sites for a fallacy they can try and apply to something that was said againt them. It results in lame (but funny) misuse of the terms. Also makes my dick soft...unless it's a hot chick doing this, in which case I'm not even listening to what she's saying, I'm busy thinking "I wonder what her vagina looks like".
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Point proven. I knew you'd fall for it, so easy.-AC
And what have I fallen for, may I ask?
I was merely stating and reminding of the kind of person i considered an utter idiot, debate-wise.
I'm assuming that you construed my comment as an indirect shot like your initial comment was? If so, you can sleep soundly tonight knowing that it wasn't one.
Originally posted by BackFire
Another one I'm seeing a lot of lately, is the MISuse of logical fallcies. These ****ing things are popular lately. And you can tell most of the people who bring them up just typed in "logical fallacy" into google and searched one of the sites for a fallacy they can try and apply to something that was said againt them. It results in lame (but funny) misuse of the terms. Also makes my dick soft...unless it's a hot chick doing this, in which case I'm not even listening to what she's saying, I'm busy thinking "I wonder what her vagina looks like".
actually, they most likely typed "lojikal falasy" and then google responed
"did you mean logical fallacy?"
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
And what have I fallen for, may I ask?I was merely stating and reminding of the kind of person i considered an utter idiot, debate-wise.
I'm assuming that you construed my comment as an indirect shot like your initial comment was? If so, you can sleep soundly tonight knowing that it wasn't one.
Just accept it, champ. Happens to the best of us (not to me, but still, I'm trying to keep your morale up.).
-AC