Tha C-Master
Zitz! Rash! Pimple!
Originally posted by Soljer
The idea that the army/marines/etc. makes you some kind of super-fighter is ridiculous. They have nothing on actual martial artists. Why?
Its true that people in the Army/Marines think highly about yourself, but thats part of the pride of serving your country. I think its bull to say they have nothing on martial artists, and its funny too because people who do martial arts are often the ones who think they are superman.
And I've delved into both, so I'm not being biased, but I disagree with what you say below.
Originally posted by Soljer
The government wants you shooting, not thinking you are superman, and trying to beat someone with your bare hands. True, they teach basic combatives, some close quarters combat, but all in all....there isn't a single military man (who doesn't practice some other style on the side, or some such) who could go up against a trained and/or professional fighter.
It is true that people in the army practice basic principles, and that's all that is needed in a fight, all of the styles and flashiness is overrated, simple. When you have superior execution, knowing 7 styles won't really save you. You need a style for range, a style for up close, a ground style, and preferrably a grab style. Military utilizes all of those into one, and they also focus on a core defense and offense, being in supreme shape is demanded, most people cannot handle the training they do there that they do in "dojo's". Especially when it comes to doing stuff underwater.
The last part is bs. Ton's of these "trained martial artists" nowadays (particularly in America), come straight out of soccer mom dojo's and have a black belt in two years. WTF?
I respect more "real" martial arts and not ones that are solely "about the belt".
Originally posted by Soljer
Versus the average joe, or even the average street fighter, military training is a lot. But the hand to hand portion lasts about two weeks of the thirteen week bootcamp. Two weeks compared to years and years? Meh.
That's to utuilitze them as quickly and as effectively as possible, and it is more concentrated and FAR more demanding than other styles would delve into in a few short weeks. But you are correct, years of combat "experience" (no matter how you get it), is vastly more important. Because most of these so called "fighters" have never even been in a real fight where "honor" and "respect" are useless, what will they do then in a real tense situation? This is why experienced street fighters often beat someone who has only trained and nothing else.
Originally posted by Soljer
Military combatives are over-rated. I'll take years of training in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, Sambo, and Thai Boxing over a career in the marines any day.
1. Shooting, firing grenades, is all combat and is alot more dangerous. (Though I recognize that you are emphasizing hand to hand in a majority of this.)
I'd like to see these other styles defend our country. And like I said there's nothing WRONG with other styles, but fighting is constantly evolving all of the time, and to simply divide something into silly "styles" is absurd, they all have their purposes. They're different.
😮💨