Originally posted by Sai1
I was just reading IGN's review of FFX2. The score they gave it, when compared to FFX contradicts what most people seem to be saying. It even contradicts what they say. I've been wondering for a while. Is IGN PS2 biased or just FF biased?
Be more specific.
Besides, IGN isn't the most reliable reviews site. I like gamespot.com much more.
Originally posted by Sai1
Is that the roundabout way of saying "yes"? 🙂
No, it's just him saying that the particular people reviewing that game liked it better.
I personally don't pay too much attention to reviews.
The common stance among fans and players of the FF series though is that FFX-2 fell far short of FFX.
Originally posted by Sai1
Alot of people seem to be saying that FFVI is the best one but I want to clarify. Do they mean the FFVI that was released in America as FFIII or do they mean the real FFVI?
Those are the same game.
FFVI is what it was known as in Japan, and FFIII is what it was called when released overseas.