The Insanity Defense

Started by xmarksthespot2 pages

Originally posted by The Omega
IMHO – anyone capable of committing violent criminal acts is insane.
That's not really accurate. Everyone is capable of committing violent criminal acts. In fact most of the people I know, myself included have the means and the knowledge to get away with it too.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
That's not really accurate. Everyone is capable of committing violent criminal acts. In fact most of the people I know, myself included have the means and the knowledge to get away with it too.

I believe you.

Originally posted by docb77
I partially agree with you. The question is though, to what degree are they responsible for their actions?

That is a good question. If you're a psychopath you're unable to grasp other peoples feelings. You're world-view is warped and not in touch with reality. Obviously psycopaths need to be locked away.

Originally posted by docb77
And in a fair system, at what stage of criminal proceedings should insanity be considered? Is the person not guilty? guilty, but not responsible? guilty and responsible, but deserving of a lesser sentence and treatment because of mitigating circumstances?

To me - any person prosecuted for a violent crime is insane. I would rather they be locked up at an insanity asylum indefinetely or until the professionals deemed the person cured of his/her insanity. It depends, of course, on the actual criminal act committed.