Exar Kun and Ludo Kressh vs. Naga Sadow and Vodo Siosk-Bass

Started by Deception2 pages

I'm NOT arguing with you, i was expressing my opinion.

Yes and your basing Kun beating Sadow on what exactly? Feats? More sources?

I'm not arguing who's stronger im stating that you cannot prove who is stronger.

Originally posted by Deception
I'm NOT arguing with you, i was expressing my opinion.

Yes, and I disagreed with your opinion. That's essentially what an argument is.

Yes and your basing Kun beating Sadow on what exactly? Feats? More sources?

I'm not arguing who's stronger im stating that you cannot prove who is stronger.

Well, considering we use Sadow in versus fights, we have to go based on what we know, and what we can deduct. Nobody can prove for sure that Exar is above even Revan, no one can prove Malak is above Ulic, no one can prove Asajj is better than Qui-Gon definitely, no one can prove x is better than y (assuming they haven't already fought, and it's not outright stated). It's hypothetical, that's what this fight is.

It really doesn't matter who's more powerful, Sadow has freakin Vodo on his team, so he loses automatically.

Lol.

Originally posted by Advent

Yes, and I disagreed with your opinion. That's essentially what an argument is.

Well, considering we use Sadow in versus fights, we have to go based on what we know, and what we can deduct. Nobody can prove for sure that Exar is above even Revan, no one can prove Malak is above Ulic, no one can prove Asajj is better than Qui-Gon definitely, no one can prove x is better than y (assuming they haven't already fought, and it's not outright stated). It's hypothetical, that's what this fight is. [/B]

Did i say you couldn't? Like i said personal opinions are not part of my argument and im not supporting idea.

Ye except you forgot a fair few things, Sadow has 2 feats to his name, and one comic, we have no idea what he has mastered and no idea what his potential/powers are, how are we going to logically deduct from that? Asaji and Quin - Gon have thorough sources on their power and their abilities, thus you can much more easily compare the two, arguments surrounding the Ancient Sith are generally more or less subjective, with intelligent people such as yourself adding good arguments and fancier words.

Doesn't Sadow take average sith and turn them into Massassi?

Ye except you forgot a fair few things, Sadow has 2 feats to his name,

Which are? Causing solar flares with his ship, which is irrelevant in a versus fight?

and one comic, we have no idea what he has mastered and no idea what his potential/powers are, how are we going to logically deduct from that?

If people are going to use Sadow in a versus match, we can't just say "we don't know, so we can't say x is above him", since in a versus match you have to put on over the other. I'm saying we shouldn't use Sadow then, but if someone does put him in a fight - we have to come to the conclusion based on what we know, which may not be much, but it stands then for the time being.

Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
Doesn't Sadow take average sith and turn them into Massassi?

No, Massassi are essentially part of the Sith species. He takes Massassi, and turns them into mutated Massassi, who are basically "super Massassi", lol:



Demonstrated by Exar Kun.