World War 3 - New World Order - Pole Shift - Age of Peace (2006-2012)

One of the most crucial decisions that Kennedy made during his short lived presidency was to pull out of Vietnam.

In his seminal work, Rule by Secrecy, Jim Marrs shows how the United States became interested in Southeast Asia in 1951 when the Rockefeller Foundation created a study group comprised of members from the Council on Foreign Relations and England's Royal Institute on International Affairs. This panel concluded that there should be a British-American takeover of this area.

Soon, these goals were being forwarded by John Foster Dulles, who was one of the founders of the Council on Foreign Relations, and who was also President Eisenhower's Secretary of State. And Ironicly enough, these goals were also being forwarded by John Foster Dulles's brother, Allen Dulles, who just so happened to be the Director of the CIA. Hmmm...coincidence? Yeah right.

To understand how our global power structure operates, we need to know that the people who funded David Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan were members of Britain's "Roundtable" founded by Cecil Rhodes, and later headed by Lord Alfred Milner. And who directed the Roundtable? Answer: the notorious Rothschild family.

In addition, the Council on Foreign Relations is a direct American descendent of the Roundtable, which posed some serious problems for President Kennedy. And aware of how prevalent this organization was in every administration prior to his own, President Kennedy stated at one point, "I'd like to have some new faces here, but all I get is the same old ones."

Notice how in that statement, President Kennedy crafted his words. He didn't say that HE selected them, but he said who he GETS.....or in other words, those who were already CHOSEN for him!

And who, you may wonder, comprised the Council on Foreign Relations in the early 1960's? Answer: the New York banking establishment, which wasn't particularly pleased with the way that President Kennedy was pushing to break the Federal Reserve's power base.

President Kennedy tried to destroy the Federal Reserve by urging businesses to deposit, invest, and borrow from non-Federal banks! He also encouraged these non-Fed banks to deal directly with and underwrite state and local financial matters. By taking this leverage away from the Federal Reserve, Kennedy could ultimately return the power to coin money back to Congress, which was how our Founding Fathers had originally established it in our Constitution.

If this had ever happened, we would have become fiscally sound by not being forced to pay inordinate amounts of interest to the international bankers as we are today.

President Kennedy's plan was quite ingenious, and he knew what he was talking about, for economist Seymour Harris said that Kennedy was, "by far the most knowledgeable President of all time in the general area of economics."

So, what we had at that time in regard to the Council on Foreign Relations/Banking establishment was a slew of individuals who were very upset by what President Kennedy was trying to do.

And who specifically were these people and institutions? Well, take a look at this list of heavy-hitters that had aligned themselves against President Kennedy:

Nelson Rockefeller - New York Governor

David Rockefeller - Chase Manhattan Bank president, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission

Douglas Dillon - President Kennedy's Treasury Secretary & Council on Foreign Relations member

The Wall Street Journal

Charles J.V. Murphy - Fortune magazine editor

Dean Rusk - Secretary of State - Iron Mountain panel member

Robert McNamara - Secretary of Defense until 1968, who later became President of the World Bank (An adjunct of the United Nations and the Council on Foreign Relations)

McGeorge Bundy - National Security Advisor - Iron Mountain panel member

William Bundy - editor of the Council on Foreign Relation's Foreign Affairs

Averill Harriman - instrumental in promoting communism in the Soviet Union

Henry Cabot Lodge - U.S. Ambassador to Saigon

John J. McCloy - Assistant Secretary of War (WWII), Kennedy advisor

Cyrus Vance - Secretary of the Army

Walt Rostow - State Department's Policy Planning Council, President Johnson's National Security Advisor

Dean Acheson - President Truman's Secretary of State, Democratic foreign policy advisor

As you can see, this was quite a formidable list of opponents for President Kennedy, and not one to be taken lightly.

you love typing don't you NuclearWinter

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
you love typing don't you NuclearWinter

lol. I have no choice.

If I could have used a magic wand to create this thread in one wave, then I would have probably opted for that.

Donald Gibson, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh, wrote in 1994's Battling Wall Street: the Kennedy Presidency, "The establishment's rejection of Kennedy became increasingly intense during his time in office. Many of the most important advocates of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, both within and OUTSIDE the government, were members of the Board of Directors of the CFR."

Gibson concludes this thought by adding, "By the early 1960's, the Council on Foreign Relations, Morgan and Rockefeller interests and the intelligence community were so extensively inbred as to be virtually a single entity."

This information is important to understand for we are now clearly able to see that there were extremely powerful forces at work in the American financial, military, and intelligence communities (among others) who had a vested interest in promoting their business, banking, and Vietnam policies.

So now is a good time to ask, what were the motives of those who wanted us to remain in Vietnam? Well, beyond the obvious profits to be made from the war, the interest to be derived by bankers off of huge loans made to the U.S., and the opium market that would be cornered in the Golden Triangle, Vietnam came to epitomize a sinister Hegelian Dialectic at work. Here is the way it operated:

First of all a PROBLEM was created where the Communist faction of the global elite's power structure took control of North Vietnam, thus "creating" a 'domino-theory' scenario that could be used as an excuse for the anti-communists. A supposed SOLUTION offered to the American people as a reason to draw them into war was to provide financial and military aid to South Vietnam. The resulting SYNTHESIS came about when the Controllers expanded their influence into Southeast Asia and exploited the area economically while at the same time transporting heroin into the United States and around the World.

So, on one side we have the CIA backing South Vietnam, while the Communists supported the North Vietnamese. And everyone from that list I posted before was telling President Kennedy to send more troops into the area to carry out the Controllers goals. But Kennedy, unlike Harry Truman and Dwight David Eisenhower before him, wanted no part of this fiasco. In fact, on October 11, 1963, a little over a month before he was assassinated, Kennedy approved of National Security Action Memorandum 263 which stated that the U.S. would pull-out of Vietnam by 1965. To prevent this from happening, the powers-that-be orchestrated a scenario where bullets rang out in Dallas on November 22, 1963, and less than two years later we had over 100,000 combat troops in Vietnam under the code name "Rolling Thunder".

To show how prevalent the elitists were in their decision, President Kennedy's successor, LBJ, met on an almost daily basis with 14 of his Vietnam advisors, (nicknamed the "Wise Men"😉. Of these 14 men, 12 of them were members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and all of them were either bankers or lawyers! Yes, you read that correctly - bankers and lawyers were making President Johnson's decision in regard to Vietnam!

Worse, as Jim Mars points out in Rule By Secrecy, is that in 1985, a 26 page declassified Congressional Record report outlined the "rules of engagement" that were placed on our troops in Vietnam.

As you read these restrictions, please hearken back to the military men who've said for years that they couldn't put their finger on it, but somehow felt as if they were being deliberately set-up to lose the war. Now you know which forces were calling the shots and implementing this defeatist policy. It was the CFR-led bankers and lawyers that were working through President Johnson, who knew virtually nothing about foreign policy or war.

1985 Congressional Record - rules of engagement and restrictions

1. The United States airforce could not attack prime targets that were determined by the military brass.

2. The United States soldiers were not allowed to fire upon the Viet Con unless they were shot at first.

3. If a tank or truck was more than 200 yards off of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, they could not be attacked.

4. A North Vietnamese plane could not be shot at unless it was in the air and overtly offensive in nature.

5. Enemy missile sites being built could not be bombed.

6. Vietnamese troops could not be tracked if they went into Laos or Cambodia.

7. The North Vietnamese were told that we could not attack certain installations, so guess what. That's where they put their anti-aircraft artillery to keep it safe!

8. Finally, arms and supplies that were necessary to perpetuate the war were prermitted to go through the Port of Haiphone - 80% of which came from the USSR and China.

While the Vietnam War was still being waged, Louisiana Congressman John R. Rarick asked in no uncertain terms why the mainstream media was not telling the truth about what was going on. He said, "Why doesn't CBS tell the American people about the CFR and let the people decide whome to blame for the Vietnam fiasco - the planners and top decision makers of a closely knit financial-industrial-intellectual aristocracy or the military leaders under CIVILIAN CONTROL..."

Did you read the final two words of that statement? CIVILIAN CONTROL - not governmental control. Congressman Rarick was telling the American people that forces OUTSIDE the government were pursuing an agenda contrary to what was in the best interest of the United States. He continued, "Who will tell the people the truth of those who control 'the right to know machinery' also control the government?"

Folks, this isn't a conspiracy theory. These are FACTS from a U.S. Congressman in the know. People always ask: why doesn't anyone ever come forward with this information that exposes the truth? Well, they do all the time. The only problem is; those who call the shots from behind-the-scenes are also the same ones who own the mainstream media outlets and conceal this same information.

Perhaps the biggest secret of the Vietnam War is that our Central Intelligence Agency seized control of the infamous Golden Triangle during that time period, then, along with assistance from various elements of Organized Crime, shipped huge amounts of heroin out of that area into our country.

Because piles of money were being made from this practice and many others, those who stood to profit from this horrendous war - the armament manufacturers, bankers, military men, and drug dealers - met any suggestions to withdraw from Vietnam with immediate consternation. But that's exactly what President John F. Kennedy intended to do upon re-election. In fact, he had already planned on telling the American people that their troops would be back home by 1965.

Think about this momentous decision for a moment. If we had exited Vietnam by 1965 like President Kennedy wanted, then EIGHT years of bloodshed in the jungles and civil unrest on America's streets and campuses could have been alleviated.

Michael Collins Piper writes in Final Judgement: "Kennedy's intended change in Vietnam policy - his plan to unilaterally withdraw from the imbroglio - infuriated not only the CIA but elements in the Pentagon and their allies in the military-industrial-complex. By this time, of course, the Lansky Syndicate had already set-up international heroin running from Southeast Asia through the CIA-linked Corsican Mafia in the Mediterranean. The joint Lansky-CIA operations in the international drug racket were a lucrative venture that thrived as a consequence of deep U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia as a cover for drug smuggling activities."

Piper's simple one-paragraph explanation may be one of the most concise overviews of the Vietnam war ever written. The military men and defense contractors were making out like bandits from the War Machine, while the CIA crooks and Lansky-led Mobsters (via Santo Traficante as the major wheeler-dealer) were likewise padding their pockets.

Author Peter Dale Scott, in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK, said of this phenomenon, "The flood of drugs into this country since WWII was one of the major 'unspeakable' secrets leading to the ongoing cover-up of the Kennedy assassination."

To provide a better perspective on this situation, Professor Alfred McCoy stated in The Politics of Heroin, "Since the prohibition of narcotics in 1920, alliances between drug brokers and intelligence agencies have protected the global narcotics traffic. Given the frequency of such alliances, there seems to be a natural attraction between intelligence agencies and criminal syndicates. Both are practitioners of what one retired CIA operative has called the 'clandestine-arts' - the basic skill of operating outside the normal channels of civil society. Among all the institutions of modern society, intelligence agencies and crime syndicates alone maintain large organizations capable of carrying out covert operations without fear of detection."

On the government side, the two main Golden Triangle runners were Ted Schackley and Thomas Clines - the same two men who ran Operation Mongoose (the plot to take Fidel Castro). Thus, from 1960-1975, the CIA deployed a secret force of 30,000 Hmong tribesmen to fight the Laotian Communists. They also created heroin labs in this area; then brought it out via their own private airline - Air America.

Alfred McCoy, in The Politics of Heroin: Cia Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, describes how the CIA first gave smack to our own American soldiers in Vietnam before shipping it into the United States where Lansky mobsters dealt it on the streets.

Sam Giancana's biographers reinforced this point by stating that while organized crime did its thing, "The CIA looked the other way - allowing over $100 million a year in illicit drugs to flow through Havana into the U.S. It was an arrangement similar to all the rest they'd made. The CIA received 10% of the take on the side of narcotics, which they utilized for their undercover slush fund."

After the Mob and the CIA generated this dirty money, they laundered it into secret bank accounts controlled by the international bankers. That way, the government couldn't get their hands on it and the funds could be invested into the stock market, loaned out to other businesses on the take, or channeled into Secret Service black budgets.

So even though the above information is only the tip of the iceberg, now do you see why it was so important to the CIA/Mobster/international banker cabal that JFK didn't pull America out of Vietnam? The money (via illegal drug trafficking and for the War Machine) was incredible, while CONTROL of another area of the globe (the Golden Triangle) was secured.

As a final note, only FOUR DAYS after President John F. Kennedy was assassinated, President Lyndon Baines Johnson, his successor, put his name on NSAM 273, which secured our increased involvement in Southeast Asia.

These guys weren't wasting any time! Within a few short months, our involvement in Vietnam went from 20,000 troops to a quarter of a million! The CIA had won, and ten years later 57,000 American soldiers were dead. Truly shocking and abysmal behavior. An embarrassment and blight on the American consciousness.

I'll leave you guys with this video clip for tonight. It's a speech given by John Stockwell who is an ex CIA Chief.

No mistake about it folks, this man is putting his LIFE on the line by giving this information to the public. All that I ask from you who are willing is to give him his respect by watching/listening to what he has to say about the CIA/drug involvement, ect.

Just click on the link below to watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0tsTTjuxdE&mode=related&search=

After President Kennedy, the situation quickly deteriorated during the Johnson Administration. As the Chicago Tribune reported in September, 1964: "David Rockefeller, President of Chase Manhattan Bank, briefed President Johnson today on his recent meeting with Premier Nikita Krushchev of Russia."

It seems that Rockefeller and Nikita talked about trade and credit, but the big question is: since when do bank presidents meet with foreign heads of state to talk about high-finance, and then report back to the President of the United States? Doesn't this scenario seem a little weird?

Here is a video clip on President Johnson that I think some of you guys may find very interesting.

Just click on the link below to watch the video clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UebjoMlkuo&mode=related&search=

Next I would like to demonstrate how all of the Presidents from President Johnson up until our current President George W. Bush have been bought and paid for.

I would also like to cover the fact that the Rockefeller family (a banking family) has been in close ties with all of our Presidents since President Kennedy and has basicly "controlled the show" since then as well.

No need to be confused my friends, because the facts will speak for themselves.

RICHARD NIXON - BOUGHT AND PAID FOR

In 1946, Richard Nixon was a small-town California lawyer who had never held public office before in his life. He was then "chosen" to run for Congress and won after receiving money from certain forces in New York City. By 1947, just one year later, he wrote a bill for the United Nations to have the ability to "enact, interpret, and enforce World law." By 1952, only six years after being a "nobody lawyer" in Southern California, Nixon was Vice President of the United States!

You may wonder how this shady, somewhat unlikable person could have had such a meteoric rise to prominence. The answer lies with a man named Prescott Bush. And for those who still don't know, Prescott Bush was the father of George Bush Sr. And is also George W. Bush (our current President's) grandfather.

Prescott Bush was Dwight Eisenhower's favorite golf partner and the man who was not only responsible for getting Nixon into politics, but also for securing Tricky Dick's (Nixon's nickname) slot as the Vice President of the United States.

Eight years later, Nixon ran for President against John F. Kennedy. As he was drawing up his platform at the Republican Convention, he was suddenly called away to Chicago to meet with someone at their apartment to work out a few "details".

Who was this individual? Mr. Nelson Rockefeller himself. And why would Nixon do such a thing? Because he already had the nomination sewed-up.

Why would he meet with the Governor of New York while he was a Presidential nominee right in the middle of the Republican Convention? It's so strange that Senator Barry Goldwater described it as "Grant surrendering to Lee."