Originally posted by Emperor AshtarNo. he was just confused. When I told him of that, in retrospect, I wasn't quite clear enough. it was my mistake, humans make mistakes. Just like you make mistakes in ignoring the logic that site provides, or believeing that 9/11 is a conspiracy. Everyone make mistakes.
KharmaDog, proving he's a moron once again.
Originally posted by TheKingofKINGS!
No. he was just confused. When I told him of that, in retrospect, I wasn't quite clear enough. it was my mistake, humans make mistakes. Just like you make mistakes in ignoring the logic that site provides, or believeing that 9/11 is a conspiracy. Everyone make mistakes.
No, KharmaDog is an idiot, and debunking 911 doesn't provide any logic, it just say's, it didn't free fall, and calculates the fall of debris that did not free fall.
EDIT And then of course there is WTC 7, which you guy's won't touch, wonder why?
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
No, KharmaDog is an idiot, and debunking 911 doesn't provide any logic, it just say's, it didn't free fall, and calculates the fall of debris that did not free fall.
Wow....I retract my previous statement, and say....
This is by far the stupidest thing I've ever read.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
No, KharmaDog is an idiot,
I hazard to guess that I am better eduacated than you.
I have time and again proven that I have better comunication skills than you.
You show, at best, a rudementary understanding of english and still fail to grasp the differences between grammar and comprehension.
You resort to name calling and baiting constantly because you are unable to debate on an intelligent level.
In order to try and strengthen your position you distort information, change your questions and repeat the same innacuracies time and time again.
You behave with the maturity of someone less then the age acceptable for a member of this forum...
...and you call me an idiot.
When you can type more than 5 posts without saying something incredible stupid your opinon might carry perhaps a gram of weight. Untill then you are the running joke of KMC.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
and debunking 911 doesn't provide any logic, it just say's, it didn't free fall, and calculates the fall of debris that did not free fall.
You realize how stupid this sounds? Read it again slowly. You embarrass yourself.
It is also interesting that you jump on people when they make the remotest mistake and then hold on to it as if it were a gold nugget. Such an overcompensation exposes both your insecurities and your inability to discern what is important in a debate.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
EDIT And then of course there is WTC 7, which you guy's won't touch, wonder why?
Originally posted by Emperor AshtarDebunking 9/11 has a section on WTC 7. You fail.
No, KharmaDog is an idiot, and debunking 911 doesn't provide any logic, it just say's, it didn't free fall, and calculates the fall of debris that did not free fall.EDIT And then of course there is WTC 7, which you guy's won't touch, wonder why?
This is why you or your sites have no credibility.
In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing the collapse of the building. Not only are the columns falling faster than the building but they are also falling faster than the debris cloud which is ALSO falling faster than the building This proves the buildings fell well below free fall speed. That is, unless the beams had a rocket pointed to the ground.
That's aie, yes, there are pieces of debris that far outpace the building, but there are those that fall at the same speed of the building.
Deceptive videos stop the timer of the fall at 10:09 when only the perimeter column hits the ground and not the building itself. If you notice the building just finishes disappearing behind the debris cloud which is still about 40 stories high.
http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/010912%20-%203rd%20clip.mpg
And of course no mention of building 7
Originally posted by KharmaDog
I hazard to guess that I am better eduacated than you.I have time and again proven that I have better comunication skills than you.
You show, at best, a rudementary understanding of english and still fail to grasp the differences between grammar and comprehension.
You resort to name calling and baiting constantly because you are unable to debate on an intelligent level.
In order to try and strengthen your position you distort information, change your questions and repeat the same innacuracies time and time again.
You behave with the maturity of someone less then the age acceptable for a member of this forum...
...and you call me an idiot.
When you can type more than 5 posts without saying something incredible stupid your opinon might carry perhaps a gram of weight. Untill then you are the running joke of KMC.
You realize how stupid this sounds? Read it again slowly. You embarrass yourself.
It is also interesting that you jump on people when they make the remotest mistake and then hold on to it as if it were a gold nugget. Such an overcompensation exposes both your insecurities and your inability to discern what is important in a debate.
Blah,Blah,Blah, KharmaDog, Your an idiot, END. 😆
Originally posted by KharmaDog
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
😘 sorry, BS sites make me puke
EDIT: It doesn't mention squat about wtc 7 free fall, which what I mean. It cover a topic half assed and is deemed credible in your eye's, this is why your an idiot.