The Economist

Started by BackFire4 pages

Re: The Economist

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I just browsed through the magazine section at Borders and I picked up the new edition of The Economist. I love picking out the odd article in The Economist and reading it from time to time, because the views in some articles are just...stunning.

I detest this magazine more than I detest the ''women's'' magazines filled with useless advice on how to lose weight while getting a promotion at job, keeping your mom and friends happy, while getting those fabulous abs while giving a blow job.

The Economist is filled with generic and simplistic views on today's world, filled with ignorant as well as (in this issue) sexist comments and articles, which are doing nothing but enforcing a stupid stereotypes, with the lack of objectivity and substance, through brainless rants which are supposed to sound intelligent!

Does anyone read or has read The Economist?

Do you agree or disagree?

Now, wait just a damn minute, you're telling me girls can get fabulous abs while giving a blowjob, and it's BAD for a magazine to inform women of this? Everymagazine/movie/videogame/bible/church/song/show should inform people of this, the more women that know, the better.

Oh, and I've never heard of this magazine. It sounds boring, I'd rather read about these blowjobs that work the abs out. I think I shall call them Blow J-abs.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No. You'd be smart if you had read it with your nose. Now you are just average. Good job, Floo.

After I read it with my eyes, I ate it with my nose. Do I get smart points for that?

Originally posted by Bardock42
What's wrong with Newsweek? It is a good and informative source of slight entertainment.

I was being snooty.

*snoots*

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
After I read it with my eyes, I ate it with my nose. Do I get smart points for that?

I was being snooty.

*snoots*

No, but you get points for the correct usage of the italics function.

You always are...you always are...like...someone who always is.

Originally posted by PVS
*PVS picks his nose*

That...is officially the sexiest post in this thread droolio

Originally posted by BackFire
Now, wait just a damn minute, you're telling me girls can get fabulous abs while giving a blowjob, and it's BAD for a magazine to inform women of this? Everymagazine/movie/videogame/bible/church/song/show should inform people of this, the more women that know, the better.

Oh, and I've never heard of this magazine. It sounds boring, I'd rather read about these blowjobs that work the abs out. I think I shall call them Blow J-abs.

You heard it here first!

Its a good way to convince your girlfriend how blow job is actually good for HER.

I don't about it actually being god, but a blow-job certainly takes me closer to heaven.

Ah-haw-haw-haw.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
I don't about it actually being god, but a blow-job certainly takes me closer to heaven.

Ah-haw-haw-haw.

Har har har har! FIXED!

Modly powers to the rescue.

Re: The Economist

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I just browsed through the magazine section at Borders and I picked up the new edition of The Economist. I love picking out the odd article in The Economist and reading it from time to time, because the views in some articles are just...stunning.

I detest this magazine more than I detest the ''women's'' magazines filled with useless advice on how to lose weight while getting a promotion at job, keeping your mom and friends happy, while getting those fabulous abs while giving a blow job.

The Economist is filled with generic and simplistic views on today's world, filled with ignorant as well as (in this issue) sexist comments and articles, which are doing nothing but enforcing a stupid stereotypes, with the lack of objectivity and substance, through brainless rants which are supposed to sound intelligent!

Does anyone read or has read The Economist?

Do you agree or disagree?

I read a fair few magazines on the subjects of foreign affairs and/or the economy, and I remember way back thinking with a name like "The Economist" it would be something I'd read.

What I found left a bad taste in my mouth, at times it gives of such a "good old boy smoking room" vibe its not funny. So yes, I agree entirely with what your say. I'm surprised it has survived on the market as long as it has, but it just goes to show that there is a market for some of the drivel it contains, when there are so many better publications out there.