Harry Grffindors Heir

Started by Guy Fawkes1 pages

Harry Grffindors Heir

i saw one of these but the idoit spelled it wrong. Well it would make sence because Grffindor was the enemy of Slytheran because he wanted only pure bloods at the school. and DD said it takes a true Grffindor to pull his sword from the hat. I'm Just Saying

Who's the bigger Idiot, the person who make a slight spelling error, or the person that makes a duplicate thread on Purpose?

yeah who is it ? 😖mart:

Originally posted by Barker
Who's the bigger Idiot, the person who make a slight spelling error, or the person that makes a duplicate thread on Purpose?
Originally posted by Barker
Who's the bigger Idiot, the person who make a slight spelling error, or the person that makes a duplicate thread on Purpose?

LMFAO 😆

I would say the second option.. 😱

Isn't it ironic that this guy spelt gryffindor wrong?

Originally posted by Barker
Who's the bigger Idiot, the person who make a slight spelling error, or the person that makes a duplicate thread on Purpose?
Originally posted by Solo
Isn't it ironic that this guy spelt gryffindor wrong?
😆

Originally posted by Solo
Isn't it ironic that this guy spelt gryffindor wrong?

He also spelled idiot, sense, and Slytherin wrong.

😆

yes, haha....

let me make a point so this thread can die:

The only special thing about Harry is that he was the boy who lived. The prophecy could be important, but not all prophecies are fulfilled, furthermore, the prophecy could have pointed to Neville.

And another thing, Godric and Salazar were friends, they just disagreed on who to teach, and Salazar left.

Now if we were to pretend they hated eachother, and that Harry happened to be his descendant, would Harry really hate the descendant of Salazar over 1,000 years later?

And by a true Gryffindor, he meant someone who can sho true courage and loyalty as a gryffindors are supposed to.

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
yes, haha....

let me make a point so this thread can die:

The only special thing about Harry is that he was the boy who lived. The prophecy could be important, but not all prophecies are fulfilled, furthermore, the prophecy could have pointed to Neville.

And another thing, Godric and Salazar were friends, they just disagreed on who to teach, and Salazar left.

Now if we were to pretend they hated eachother, and that Harry happened to be his descendant, would Harry really hate the descendant of Salazar over 1,000 years later?

And by a true Gryffindor, he meant someone who can sho true courage and loyalty as a gryffindors are supposed to.

You pass. Heres a cookie. *hands him cookie*

Well he got Heir right this time. Wonder if a third try would get it right. Three's a charm 😐

where in the book does it say they were friends

Originally posted by Guy Fawkes
where in the book does it say they were friends

on the first book remember helga hufflepuff, salazer slytheren godric gryffindor and rowena ravenclaw were friends and on the sorting hat's song on 5th book

does it matter? there dead now!

Originally posted by allofyousuckkk
yes, haha....

let me make a point so this thread can die:

The only special thing about Harry is that he was the boy who lived. The prophecy could be important, but not all prophecies are fulfilled, furthermore, the prophecy could have pointed to Neville.

And another thing, Godric and Salazar were friends, they just disagreed on who to teach, and Salazar left.

Now if we were to pretend they hated eachother, and that Harry happened to be his descendant, would Harry really hate the descendant of Salazar over 1,000 years later?

And by a true Gryffindor, he meant someone who can sho true courage and loyalty as a gryffindors are supposed to.

Yes the prophecy could have meant Neville. That has already been established. But it only refers to Harry becuase Voldemort marked hiom and not Neville.

Regardless of the prophecy, it seems that only put emphasis on bloodlines (thereby heirs) and there would be no reason to keep track of blood 1000 years later.

If there wasn't any reason to keep track of a bloodline a 1000 years later, then how did Tom Riddle know that he was Slytherin's heir huh?

JK didn't place any emphasis on Harry being a heir, so most probably, he isn't.

He is however a true gryffindor, demonstrated when he pulled Godric's sword out of the hat.