Military Translator Discharged For Being Gay

Started by Draco694 pagesPoll

Should Gays Be Allowed To Serve Openly in the US Military?

Military Translator Discharged For Being Gay

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/US/story?id=2274124&page=1

Which begs the question:

Should homosexuals be allowed to serve the US military?

That pretty bad. Now who are they going to use to translate information they get from gay arabs?

I don't know...umbrellas with ducksauce on them?

Personally I think that the actual military should get to decide. They would know better than anyone how it would affect them. That being said, I don't have a problem with it. My knee-jerk reaction is, "of course not." But after consideration, The military shouldn't be about that. If someone want's to put their life on the line, more power to them and we should respect that. The biggest potential problems I see are uncomfortable living arrangements, and possible hazing.

Basically banning gays makes about as much sense as banning adulterers or fornicators (which would pretty much eliminate the military from what I've heard.)

-edit-

I don't think however that it should be an issue. I don't think it should be a question on a form, and I don't think that people gay or straight should make a point of talking about their sexuality.

Originally posted by docb77
Personally I think that the actual military should get to decide. They would know better than anyone how it would affect them. That being said, I don't have a problem with it. My knee-jerk reaction is, "of course not." But after consideration, The military shouldn't be about that. If someone want's to put their life on the line, more power to them and we should respect that. The biggest potential problems I see are uncomfortable living arrangements, and possible hazing.

Basically banning gays makes about as much sense as banning adulterers or fornicators (which would pretty much eliminate the military from what I've heard.)

Banning homosexuals makes about as much sense as banning blacks.

I mean they're incredibly stupid, they're likely to smoke weed and listen to gangsta rap on duty and they more likely to shoot each other over some badly cut crack than the enemy.

And what sane white man would want to live with a Negro? Jesus, you know they're gonna be up all night watching BET and being all loud. Stealth is gonna be impossible with them!

Originally posted by Draco69
Banning homosexuals makes about as much sense as banning blacks.

I mean they're incredibly stupid, they're likely to smoke weed and listen to gangsta rap on duty and they more likely to shoot each other over some badly cut crack than the enemy.

And what sane white man would want to live with a Negro? Jesus, you know they're gonna be up all night watching BET and being all loud. Stealth is gonna be impossible with them!

You joke, but how long did it take to actually integrate blacks into the military? Blacks have pretty much always served, but for most of the time they were separate units.

Here's the question though, would you want an openly racist person in a mostly black unit? That's how most people are probably looking at this.

I didn't know that you could not serve in the military if you were gay. Well if there is a draft anytime soon, I'm just going to say that I'm gay.

Originally posted by Flamboyant4Life
I didn't know that you could not serve in the military if you were gay. Well if there is a draft anytime soon, I'm just going to say that i'm gay.

You CAN...as long as nobody knows. So if you're gay, you need a faghag to pose as a girlfriend, buy alot of Playboys to stick under your bed and practice your dating stories for your fellow soldiers....

"Don't ask, don't tell"

No, I mean say that I'm gay to get out of the draft.

Originally posted by docb77
You joke, but how long did it take to actually integrate blacks into the military? Blacks have pretty much always served, but for most of the time they were separate units.

They served as FULL citizens for the first time in WWI. And it wasn't pretty. They were lynched by their fellow soldiers. White soldiers absolutely refused to bunk with them. The black soldiers were literally used as human shields in the miltary.

They were outright against it because A) they believe blacks wouldn't be good soldiers (like gays...) and B) they believed blacks in the miltary would disrupt unit cohesion (like gays...)

Well history proved them wrong, did it not?

Originally posted by docb77
Here's the question though, would you want an openly racist person in a mostly black unit? That's how most people are probably looking at this.

That's an extremely poor analogy....

You're assuming that a racist person is synomously offensive as a gay person in the military as to straight person.

That's bull.

All blacks don't like racists who call them the n-word....

Straight guys in the miltary? They don't give a f*ck. Some of them have a problem with it. But ALL of them? Hardly. In fact, most scientific polls show that military soldiers don't have a problem with gay people serving in the miltary.

Why should we pander the few, homophobic soldiers who can't serve functionally with gay people in the military?

They're the minority. They should be discharged. Either put up or shut up.

If they can't deal with a gay person interpreting key witnesses of them, than they certainly cannot deal with far more serious issues and they certainly don't belong in the army...

I belief that all people should be allowed to talk about their sexuality in the military, cause then it would take their minds off of all of the less important issues, like defending the country.

[EDIT] I\'ll bee using spellcheck for now on, so I\'ll sound more intelligent. They\'re might still be some error though, cause they don\'t have grammar check.

Originally posted by Flamboyant4Life
No, I mean say that I'm gay to get out of the draft.

They tried that in the Vietnam War. Didn't work for most people. They actually needed PROOF they were gay.

Originally posted by Draco69
They tried that in the Vietnam War. Didn\'t work for most people. They actually needed PROOF they were gay.

So if a man have sex with another man, and then he take pictures of it to get out of the draft, would that make him gay?

Originally posted by ChancellorGohan
So if a man have sex with another man, and then he take pictures of it to get out of the draft, would that make him gay?

Some actually tried that, believe it or not.

It would have been far less stressing if they escaped to Canada like Senator Kerry...

Originally posted by Draco69
They tried that in the Vietnam War. Didn't work for most people. They actually needed PROOF they were gay.
Oh I'd think of a way.

Originally posted by docb77
Basically banning gays makes about as much sense as banning adulterers or fornicators
Originally posted by docb77
Blacks have pretty much always served, but for most of the time they were separate units.

Well, then we can have seperate units for blacks, gays and fornicaters and we can call it the 501st embarassment brigade.

Originally posted by Draco69
Some actually tried that, believe it or not.

It would have been far less stressing if they escaped to Canada like Senator Kerry...

Butt if he liked it that won time, would that mean he bee gay?

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, then we can have seperate units for blacks, gays and fornicaters and we can call it the 501st embarassment brigade.

Or one for gay black, one for gay white, and one for all the normal people.

[EDIT] Forgot to add one for gay chinese, gay indian, and gay south american.

[EDIT] i think it easier just to put all the gays together.

[EDIT] Actually it just be easier too not talk about you\'re sexuality regardless of what race you are.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, then we can have seperate units for blacks, gays and fornicaters and we can call it the 501st embarassment brigade.

Rofldoodle.

Anyway, I don't see a reason that gays shouldn't be allowed to serve.

"Here's how I feel about gays in the military: Anyone ... dumb enough ... to want to be in the military ... should be allowed in. End of ****ing story. That should be the only requirement. I don't care how many push-ups you can do - put on a helmet, go wait in that fox hole. We'll tell you when we need you to kill somebody. I've been watching all these Congressional hearings and all these military guys and all the pundits going, 'The esprit de corps will be affected, and we are such a moral ...' Excuse me, but aren't you all a bunch of ****ing hired killers? Shut up! You are thugs, and when we need you to go blow the **** out of a nation of little brown people, we'll let you know. Until then ..."

- Bill Hicks