Interesting Theory

Started by Strangelove1 pagesPoll

Should we delete never-posted members?

Interesting Theory

Considering the thousands of members KMC has, and hundreds who post, shouldn't the members who never ever posted just get deleted? It'd make things flow better in my humble opinion

discuss

Wrong Forum, I think.

This is GDF Worthy?

I wasn't sure, so I just went to the one where more people would see it

Maybe delete them after a certain length of time. Because like option 2, they could always decide to use their account a while after they make it. But chances are that if they never post, they'll forget they even have it.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Considering the thousands of members KMC has, and hundreds who post, shouldn't the members who never ever posted just get deleted? It'd make things flow better in my humble opinion

discuss

Yup i was thinking the same thing, theres people who have been on here for years, and have like 0 to 5 posts.

This has been mentioned to Raz before, and If I recall, he refused to do this.

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine

This is GDF Worthy?

Not really😕

NOt GDF worthy, Nes and Questions and Suggestion thread. A certain amount of time (That from now on members are informed of the time limit before account deletion).

Raz' previous answer was that they don' t cause a problem and hardly take any space, so there would be no point in deleting them. But it does serve the purpose of keeping a record of people who have applied for membership.

Please post your theory in The Suggestion Thread. I' m not opting for a merge, because it would attach a specific poll to a general thread.

Closing.