Sig Size

Started by BakaXero6 pages

Originally posted by LanceWindu
I vote for larger filesize and one extra line of text.

I'm happy with the dimensions. sigs made any larger will become an eye sore and can be scrolling hazard. But dont make it any smaller. size limit about 45kb max cause Kmc still needs to be 56k friendly

Originally posted by BakaXero
I'm happy with the dimensions. sigs made any larger will become an eye sore and can be scrolling hazard. But dont make it any smaller. size limit about 45kb [b]max cause Kmc still needs to be 56k friendly [/B]

✅ I totally Agree

thumb_up

I am pretty happy with how it is, wouldn't mind the kb being taken up a little.. like 40kb would be good. 🙂

I personally would like to see the kb limit increased but the actual size limitations I prefer like many I generally make sigs that are on the smaller side (400x150 if not smaller) as I think larger ones tend to look too imposing. I just find that sometimes I have to remove something I like from a sig because it makes it exceed the kb limit unless I vastly reduce the quality.

As a comprimise, I'm thinking of upping the filesize to around 50k, and extending the dimensions of the width to make better use of the space.

Would that be fair?

That'd be awesome Raz.

I've upped an example in my sig of the max dimensions, and its only 17k.

I'm thinking 540x150 as it would fit the 800x600 resolution perfectly.

Originally posted by Raz
As a comprimise, I'm thinking of upping the filesize to around 50k, and extending the dimensions of the width to make better use of the space.

Would that be fair?

I believe that sounds absolutely perfect.

I've always been a fan of wider sigs myself, and the higher file size would be great.

...but who uses 800x600 anymore? 😛

I wish for more size in kb's.

But what does it matter for me? I don't have a limit. 😬

However, I think we can see some better signatures with the option of higher quality.

540x150 sounds about right...

I totally dont use 800x600 🥷

(I do on this computer, it's really old)

For 800x600 this would be right:

For 1024x768 this:

Hmm..dunno. Only problem is that the second one will mess up the layout for anyone lazy enough not to change the default XP resolution.

The second one is too excessive imo.

Yeah, second one's far too big, I think.

I wouldn't be able to make a sig at either of those sizes. 😛 Too big, but more power to anyone who can.

... 😛

Originally posted by §P0oONY
... 😛

The empty space...it burns...

Originally posted by Lana
The empty space...it burns...

It's minimalism... It's fashionable.. 😛

Originally posted by Raz
As a comprimise, I'm thinking of upping the filesize to around 50k, and extending the dimensions of the width to make better use of the space.

Would that be fair?


I absolutely love you.

I would love a little larger kb limit, but I think that the pixel size is great.

Originally posted by Dusty
I wish for more size in kb's.

Originally posted by Aurora
I would love a little larger kb limit.

Don't be greedy. ermm

Originally posted by Raz
As a comprimise, I'm thinking of upping the filesize to around 50k, and extending the dimensions of the width to make better use of the space.

Would that be fair?

50k is awesome clap

i dont really care about the dimensions.