Sagat vs Ryuji Yamazaki

Started by P-Geyser2 pages
P-Geyser Saraya-Jade Maniac

Sagat vs Ryuji Yamazaki

The honarable muay Thai fighter vs The sadistic madman who takes it?

here are the bio's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryuji_Yamazaki

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

this might b a tough 1 but u probally know who im gonna say,sagat.

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon

Yamakazi hasn't had showings in years, I give it to sagat. If terry can beat him, so, can sagat.

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

i dont ever remember ryuji ever haveing a GOOD showing,exept in cvs2 he was pretty cool

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by Remulous
i dont ever remember ryuji ever haveing a GOOD showing,exept in cvs2 he was pretty cool

And not canon.

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

right,its a shame win your rival company can make some of your characters better than u can,playmore needs to get it together or i see them suffering the same fate as snk

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon

Originally posted by Remulous
right,its a shame win your rival company can make some of your characters better than u can,playmore needs to get it together or i see them suffering the same fate as snk
\

Capcom and snk are not rival companies 😆
Snk's main title is KOF, capcom has a bunch of famous titles that exceed the fighting genre, snk doesn't really have much except meatl slug, samurai showdown, and KOF.

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

yeah,but many say that kof is the most popular and innovative fighting franchise on earth even more than SF, due 2 steady a continuity, i think playmore wood fair better if they disbanded kof and put each character back in their own games.

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by Remulous
yeah,many say that kof is the most popular and innovative fighting franchise on earth even more than SF,i think playmore wood fair better if they disbanded and put each character back in their own games.

Who the hell said that, what's so innovative about KOF?

Last I checked capcom arcade games own them in the U.S and japan.

Blanka I has a titlez

sagat would win easily and capcom have better fighting games overall than snk imo

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Who the hell said that, what's so innovative about KOF?

Last I checked capcom arcade games own them in the U.S and japan.

although i dont really b leave wiki they have said it their and on almost every other video game site u can think of

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

Originally posted by Blanka
sagat would win easily and capcom have better fighting games overall than snk imo
unfortunately that might b true

shin_remy Senior Member
Originally posted by Remulous
yeah,but many say that kof is the most popular and innovative fighting franchise on earth even more than SF, due 2 steady a continuity, i think playmore wood fair better if they disbanded kof and put each character back in their own games.

who said that ?

brainchild81 Privateer

Ol' one eye

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

well i read it on wiki,ign,gamespot,and a hole bunch of other site.i also heard it on a gt video game review of 1 of those kof games,just about any video game site will tell u kof is the best

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon
Originally posted by Remulous
well i read it on wiki,ign,gamespot,and a hole bunch of other site.i also heard it on a gt video game review of 1 of those kof games,just about any video game site will tell u kof is the best

Wikipedia, ign,gamespot, are not good sources for arcade popular opinion.

SaTsuJiN Wielder of Thunder Seal

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Who the hell said that, what's so innovative about KOF?

Last I checked capcom arcade games own them in the U.S and japan.

from what I've seen, each KoF is a true sequel (introducing new guard types, super bars, changing characters special moves either slightly or replacing them entirely with something new)... while each street fighter released seems like an expansion pack (for you PC gamers out there)

i.e. KoF 95 to KoF 96... then you got street fighter III : new generation, then street fighter III : second impact...

at least thats the first thing I can think of when comparing the two

Imagine how interesting it would be to pick up a street fighter game to find out that hadouken isnt down to forward and punch... or that when you do down to forward and punch, hadouken has a different status effect / animation... thats whats great about KoF , IMO

Emperor Ashtar Balloooooooooooooon

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
from what I've seen, each KoF is a true sequel (introducing new guard types, super bars, changing characters special moves either slightly or replacing them entirely with something new)... while each street fighter released seems like an expansion pack (for you PC gamers out there)

i.e. KoF 95 to KoF 96... then you got street fighter III : new generation, then street fighter III : second impact...

at least thats the first thing I can think of when comparing the two

Imagine how interesting it would be to pick up a street fighter game to find out that hadouken isnt down to forward and punch... or that when you do down to forward and punch, hadouken has a different status effect / animation... thats whats great about KoF , IMO

Because they change their moves, WOW.

Remulous Frisky Wolf Lord

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
from what I've seen, each KoF is a true sequel (introducing new guard types, super bars, changing characters special moves either slightly or replacing them entirely with something new)... while each street fighter released seems like an expansion pack (for you PC gamers out there)

i.e. KoF 95 to KoF 96... then you got street fighter III : new generation, then street fighter III : second impact...

at least thats the first thing I can think of when comparing the two

Imagine how interesting it would be to pick up a street fighter game to find out that hadouken isnt down to forward and punch... or that when you do down to forward and punch, hadouken has a different status effect / animation... thats whats great about KoF , IMO

now what u said about kof was tru or at least it use 2 b,but SF NO!!!i can tell u dont,like SF that much.when they make a new true SF sequal they go all out,they completly change the battle system 4 the most part,change the art and graphic styles now i cant say that 4 kof,and completely wipe out the previous cast and add a new 1,or just add $h!t load of NEW ones.capcom is the defintion of 2d fighting innovation.kof is innovative 2 but no matter what they do i still feel like im playing KOF 96 which isnt a bad thing but is tedious 1,some times.

brainchild81 Privateer

I gotta agree w/EA there. When I do down to foward & punch, a fireball better fly out! Change only what needs changing