Originally posted by badabingA repsonse to this post is only warrented as long as the post in which its responding to is responded to in a fashion that carries over the validity of the respondee's rehtoric.
Scoob didn't complain about anything. You're assuming his motives, he may have wondered how he found the link to the smiley page.You're the one who started flaming. 😆
Try again, I wasn't refering to Scoobs.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Inquery: what cognition did you induce to assign the value of "uptight" to my state of being?
Because no normal people would even think to respond the way you did. 😐
Originally posted by Creshosk
Inquery: what cognition did you induce to assign the value of "upset" to my state of being?
You obviously wouldn't have taken the time and effort of replying to this if you weren't. Either that or YOU want attention. 🙄
Originally posted by Creshosk
I deduced that your actions were dictated by deficency in the amount of attention you were receiving. I sought to satiate that need with an appropriate course of reaction.
Yeah, I want the attention, but you're the one reacting to it so poorly. What's the point of ranting about something as pointless as that? Really, I want to know, because something has to be totally wrong for you to just respond like this. Did I offend you with that picture? I didn't mean to offend, and if I did, I'm sorry. But sue me, I thought it was funny.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Negative, I have merely requested a cease function.
I was ready to drop the subject, and not even give it a second though until you had to reply with all your garbage. What's the point of it? It obviously stems from something deeper than just your view of it being 'irrelevant.'
Originally posted by Creshosk
Fun sans reason borders on a lack of sanity.
So now you're calling ME insane without even knowing me when YOU'RE the one who had to responed in this way?? 😱 😆
Originally posted by Creshosk
But every single thread does not have people who fail to grasp a situation and in response divert to fatuous vies for attention.
It wasn't for attention, so please stop with that. There is no relevance to getting this worked up about an insignificant little MEANINGLESS picture.
Originally posted by Creshosk
I deduced that your actions were dictated by deficency in the amount of attention you were receiving. I sought to satiate that need with an appropriate course of reaction.
APPROPRIATE? 😑 No, this wasn't really appropriate at all. You have not accomplished anything by this. The only thing you've succeeded at is taking this thread even FURTHER off subject. Nice job!
Originally posted by Creshosk
What stimulates my amusement is that the very values you assigned to me are clearly ehibited in your responses. And what you neglect to observe as well is that those values are not present in my stateof being.
Really? Cause you wouldn't have even responded if you didn't think of this as anything, or if it didn't go against what you stand for. It was meant as a simple meaningless joke, but guess what? YOU had to take much much further than that. Well, again, nice job. I guess you succeeded at your goal.
Originally posted by Creshosk
A repsonse to this post is only warrented as long as the post in which its responding to is responded to in a fashion that carries over the validity of the respondee's rehtoric.Try again, I wasn't refering to Scoobs.
😆
Originally posted by Creshosk
You might or you might not have a high intelligence, but you have a low wisdom showing right now.Intellect= general knowledge of things and ability to deduce things.
Wisdom= knowledge of when to use your intelligence.
Actually I believe it's:
wisdom: the quality of being wise; the power of judging rightly and following the soundest course of action, based on knowledge, experience, understanding, etc. ; good judgment ; discretion ; sagacity
Originally posted by Creshosk
Your conclusion is invalid. The previous responder to your post is clearly agitated in a manner which I am not. He probably lacked the cognition to read the value assigned to some of the verbiage I exude and thusly to compensate had to see the cognition deficiency elsewhere.
Wrong. You were the one who started with the insults. I'm simply wondering why in the hell somebody would even think of something like that from a meaningless joke and take it as far as you did? 😑
Originally posted by Psyquis52
Actually I believe it's:wisdom: the quality of being wise; the power of judging rightly and following the soundest course of action, based on knowledge, experience, understanding, etc. ; good judgment ; discretion ; sagacity
Originally posted by badabingWhat on earth?
I guess in your dictionary wisdom is equated with insults, flaming and instigation. Good show. 😆
I hope you weren't talking to me badabing, because that would hurt my feelings. I'm very sensitive.
That was Webster's dictionary btw. If we go by that definition then I think it brings new insight to the conversation.
Also..........Leader wins. 😉
Originally posted by Psyquis52
What on earth?I hope you weren't talking to me badabing, because that would hurt my feelings. I'm very sensitive.
That was Webster's dictionary btw. If we go by that definition then I think it brings new insight to the conversation.
Also..........Leader wins. 😉
He was talking about Cresh. 😬
Originally posted by Psyquis52
What on earth?I hope you weren't talking to me badabing, because that would hurt my feelings. I'm very sensitive.
That was Webster's dictionary btw. If we go by that definition then I think it brings new insight to the conversation.
Also..........Leader wins. 😉