David Icke:- why does he add the irrational?

Started by Bicnarok2 pagesPoll

David Icke:- why does he add the irrational?

David Icke:- why does he add the irrational?

Those who have seen any complete David Icke documentary will notice how well he presents his convincing evidence.
But why does he go on to talk about "Blood drinking Lizards" "the arian race is from mars, and landed in the Caucaus mountians" and then his "I am the son of God" comment doesn´t help even though we are all sons and daughters God.

Its seems to me these seemingly illogical, unproven and in most peoples eyes rediculous comments are made for a reason. But why??

To quote Eric Bischoff, "Controversy Creates Cash."

he wasnt implying he was jesus. he doesnt even believe in god. the media and everyone else misinterpreted him. i have posted what he really meant several times.

he is not the only conspiracy theorist who believes that extraterrestrials are involved in the conspiracy. what he believes does sound crazy at firstglance but if you read his books and other peoples books you would say:

''well yes this appears crazy but it makes a lot of sense and after looking at the evidence, there maybe more to it''

icke spends an incredible amount of time travelling the world talking and reserching the conspiracy. the amount of research he has done is incredible.

By research you mean sitting down with tribesmen and sharing the peace pipe...because thats all he does...

Originally posted by Deano
he wasnt implying he was jesus. he doesnt even believe in god. the media and everyone else misinterpreted him. i have posted what he really meant several times.

he is not the only conspiracy theorist who believes that extraterrestrials are involved in the conspiracy. what he believes does sound crazy at firstglance but if you read his books and other peoples books you would say:

''well yes this appears crazy but it makes a lot of sense and after looking at the evidence, there maybe more to it''


What evidence ? I don't know him as well as you do, but still, what evidence ? I only have seen "very debatable" evidence, and that's not me being a dick, that's me using my brains.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
By research you mean sitting down with tribesmen and sharing the peace pipe...because thats all he does...

hahaha your hilarious

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
To quote Eric Bischoff, "Controversy Creates Cash."
Ew.....you just quoted wrestling.........when it was at its worst.

In one thing i saw he said he knew people who actually saw top politicians and the like turning temporarily into lizards. This sounds a bit odd, and where are the witneses?

He is not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead..

David Icke kinda brings it on himself when people dont take him serious when talking about 9-11.I mean how can anybody take someone serious who says there are lizard men walking around on the earth and E.T'S were responsible for 9-11? Now alex jones he doesnt deserve the crap that he gets from people,he has stone cold hard facts that he goes by.

yeh but alex jones believes in a god who sits on a cloud. so why is he more credible than icke? quick answer...he isnt

Originally posted by Deano
yeh but alex jones believes in a god who sits on a cloud. so why is he more credible than icke? quick answer...he isnt

Becase he's good at covering a petecular topic, wish I could say the same for icke.

icke is excellent at covering the new world order. his mind isnt limited to what is and what isnt possible, unlike alex jones.

Originally posted by Deano
icke is excellent at covering the new world order. his mind isnt limited to what is and what isnt possible, unlike alex jones.

I'll agree on you there, but he isn't covering anything that jordan maxwell hasn't explained better.

why has he explained it better? in what way?

Originally posted by Deano
why has he explained it better? in what way?

For one thing, jordan maxwell cover's particular groups, the origin of religion, martime admarilaty law, and he's been doing way longer than icke. even tsarion explains things better than icke. Icke can never focus on a particular subject, he fails to elaborate it in detail.

icke explains enough to wake people up

Originally posted by Deano
icke explains enough to wake people up

Waking people up is not enough, which proves my point. stating the problem doesn't equal a solution, what solution does icke offer, infinite love?

what is the solution?

the only way the earth can be at peace is if the human race express infinite love. but dotn make out this is the only solution icke gives.