Creation vs Evolution

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[list=1][*]Evolution does not make any claims about how life came to exist.

[*]It attempts to point out flaws in the theory by constructing a Straw Man argument, i.e. by pointing out the unlikelihood of life coming to exist by chance alone, when the theory suggests that life came to exist by a combination of chance and the laws of physics, which is highly likely.[/list]

I beg to differ. The probability of life coming into existence by a combination of chance and the laws of physics is not highly likely, it is highly unlikely that this occurred. Furthermore, you referred to the "laws of physics." A law (any law) necesitates a law-giver or maker. So, how does the theory of evolution account for or explain the existence of the laws of physics (or any non-, man-made law i.e. gravity etc.)?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I beg to differ. The probability of life coming into existence by a combination of chance and the laws of physics is not highly likely, it is highly unlikely that this occurred. Furthermore, you referred to the "laws of physics." A law (any law) necesitates a law-giver or maker. So, how does the theory of evolution account for or explain the existence of the laws of physics (or any non-, man-made law i.e. gravity etc.)?

[list=1][*]Regarding the likelihood of life coming into existence by a combination of chance and the laws of physics, you are wrong.

[*]Your argument that the existence of natural laws requires the existence of a law maker is based entirely on semantics.

Moreover, evolution only explains common descent; it does not attempt to explain natural.[/list]

Originally posted by FeceMan
*Coughs.*

My apologies, dear boy, but you are an ignoramous. That is not at all what "religious nuts" say.

Also, there will never be definite proof of evolution--you know what I mean, so no one jump down my throat--because we cannot actually observe it.

(Again, don't jump down my ****ing throat. I'm talking about the progression of single-celled organisms to multicellular organisms.)

Apology accepted. I realize I generalized, and I meant most religious fanatics. You caught me.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[list=1][*]Regarding the likelihood of life coming into existence by a combination of chance and the laws of physics, you are wrong.

[*]Your argument that the existence of natural laws requires the existence of a law maker is based entirely on semantics.

Moreover, evolution only explains common descent; it does not attempt to explain natural.[/list]

“As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents of physics and astronomy that have worked together to our benefit, it almost seems as if the Universe must in some sense have known that we were coming.”
-F. Dyson

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
[list=1][*]Regarding the likelihood of life coming into existence by a combination of chance and the laws of physics, you are wrong.

[*]Your argument that the existence of natural laws requires the existence of a law maker is based entirely on semantics.

Moreover, evolution only explains common descent; it does not attempt to explain natural.[/list]

Evolution still at work!

Are chimps becoming cavemen?

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/070411_chimps_cave.html

Originally posted by FeceMan
You're wrong 'cause you're gay.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Evolution still at work!

Are chimps becoming cavemen?

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/070411_chimps_cave.html

Originally posted by Alliance
...

Don't dot... 🙄

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Evolution still at work!

Are chimps becoming cavemen?

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/070411_chimps_cave.html

DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Evolution still at work!

Are chimps becoming cavemen?

http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/070411_chimps_cave.html

Originally posted by FeceMan
OMFG BEARS EVOLVING INTO HUMANS

Dis you even read the article? 🙄

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Dis you even read the article? 🙄

Chimps using caves = evolution of monkey into man.
Bears using caves = evolution of bear into man.

Makes perfect sense.

I think a better question would be the evolution of creation.Their are many enteresting stories of the universes creation out their and some even kind of merge together.

Originally posted by FeceMan
OMFG BEARS EVOLVING INTO HUMANS

even if you seperate the evolutionary aspect from the article...

You still don't find it amazing that there are other animals out there capable of using tools to hunt and finding shelter?

Originally posted by FeceMan

Chimps using caves = evolution of monkey into man.
Bears using caves = evolution of bear into man.

you don't honestly believe that this is a valid comparison do you?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Yeah.

Chimps using caves = evolution of monkey into man.
Bears using caves = evolution of bear into man.

Makes perfect sense.

Maybe to someone who has absolutely no knowledge of evolution.

Originally posted by FeceMan
OMFG BEARS EVOLVING INTO HUMANS

It was a ****ing joke.

Originally posted by FeceMan
It was a ****ing joke.