Originally posted by Newjak
Well I wouldn't say as good as fact.I would say as good as probable is better. 😛
Nah, I'd say as good as fact. Solely because if the concept of evolution is not fact than neither is that the earth is roundish.
Actually, evolution is more fact than gravity, yet I don't see one IDer protesting that.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, I'd say as good as fact. Solely because if the concept of evolution is not fact than neither is that the earth is roundish.Actually, evolution is more fact than gravity, yet I don't see one IDer protesting that.
dont get transfinitum started on gravity, he tried to disprove it to me at school 😛 (im really serious about that)
Originally posted by Bardock42
You go to school?Besides, there are points one can bring against gravity in a Newtonian way as we understand it now, there aren't against evolution.
im 16 bro.
and to transfinitum, for a day you did try n convince me gravity was false. you also advocated geocentrism at a later time.
Originally posted by Bardock42Nah
Nah, I'd say as good as fact. Solely because if the concept of evolution is not fact than neither is that the earth is roundish.Actually, evolution is more fact than gravity, yet I don't see one IDer protesting that.
Cause the Premises of those are at least proven true or should I say partially proven.
Satellite's you know have photographed that the earth is circular from multiple dimensions.
As for Gravity things do fall towards Earth which has the largest mass.
Plus there is actual mathematical functions that are true and have been proven true through observations making gravity and a round Earth quantifiable.
Evolution doesn't quite get these gifts.
So Gravity could be called fact or a round Earth could be called fact.
Evolution is just highly probable based on the assumptions of Evolution being true.
😛
Originally posted by chickenlover98
im 16 bro.and to transfinitum, for a day you did try n convince me gravity was false. you also advocated geocentrism at a later time.
Originally posted by ushomefree
Darwinian Evolution: MutationsHow are mutations beneficial?
that video looks and sounds like some hooker off the street reading cue cards
Originally posted by NewjakI am specifically referring to theories that gravity is just a bend in space/time, not a force like the other three known ones.
NahCause the Premises of those are at least proven true or should I say partially proven.
Satellite's you know have photographed that the earth is circular from multiple dimensions.
As for Gravity things do fall towards Earth which has the largest mass.
Plus there is actual mathematical functions that are true and have been proven true through observations making gravity and a round Earth quantifiable.
Evolution doesn't quite get these gifts.
So Gravity could be called fact or a round Earth could be called fact.
Evolution is just highly probable based on the assumptions of Evolution being true.
😛
So, our popular understanding of gravity is actually opposed by credible scientific theories.
Evolution is not.
Originally posted by ushomefree😆 I coudn't keep watching that video because it is so much BS 😆
Darwinian Evolution: MutationsHow are mutations beneficial?
Originally posted by Bardock42I could point out that the things that oppose Gravity as a force are nothing then in themselves slightly probable as we understand it. I would also like to point that in and off themselves do not take Gravity away.
I am specifically referring to theories that gravity is just a bend in space/time, not a force like the other three known ones.So, our popular understanding of gravity is actually opposed by credible scientific theories.
Evolution is not.
And like I said Evolution is probable why because there are odds that it will be proven or disproven and is relative to the information gained from possible future discoveries.
That makes it probable not fact.
Or would you say that the odds of proving Evolution are astronomically higher than disproving it?
Originally posted by Newjak
I could point out that the things that oppose Gravity as a force are nothing then in themselves slightly probable as we understand it. I would also like to point that in and off themselves do not take Gravity away.And like I said Evolution is probable why because there are odds that it will be proven or disproven and is relative to the information gained from possible future discoveries.
That makes it probable not fact.
Or would you say that the odds of proving Evolution are astronomically higher than disproving it?
I would say the last thing.
But what I was saying is that everything is only a probability.