Creation vs Evolution

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I was just being melodramatic. 😮

And, that most certainly doesn't set you free!

Originally posted by ~Flamboyant~
Sorry if this has been done, but which do you beleive in and why?

I personally beleive in the Evolution theory, because it has basically been scientifically proven. Especially by the Hard-Weinberg Principle.

http://www.geocities.com/thelieevolution/index.html

I found the above link very informative why don't you and the rest of the KMC team check it out (that means everyone who is a member of this forum).

JesusIsAlive, I don't recommend any link that you would recommend.

Especially when you get your science from a GEOCITIES site.

Originally posted by Alliance
Especially when you get your science from a GEOCITIES site.

Indeed:

Evolution is a lie because evolutionists have no evidence, not Star Wars, not swords, not pitchforks, not pointed shoes, nothing. When they wisely default on the Life Science Challenge it proves they are all bluff and no science, or as they say in the Southwest, all hat and no ranch. Now, you say you have a jumping frog that can beat our jumping frog but you refuse to put you money where your mouth is. Or you say you have a runner who can beat our runner or a jumper who can jump higher than our jumper. Well, let's put them on a level
playing field and see. The proof is in the results of the contest. The contest settles the issue with finality. Hot air contests never end. The Super Bowl and the World Series are not decided with hot air on web sites. If you are so sure of your position you would debate. You have been called out. Contend or default.

Apparently their evolution debate took place around a 6th period lunch table.

Why does no one quote scientists, such as Porkinhorne of Cambridge?

just because Polkinghorne is a scientist does not make him credible.

Besides, hes more of a thoelogist than a physicist.

Originally posted by Alliance
just because Polkinghorne is a scientist does not make him credible.

Besides, hes more of a thoelogist than a physicist.

I'm glad you got the name right, hopefully he won't browse this thread and get offended...however, he was a bit more than a theologian. Certainly more credible than Richard Dawkins.

Except Dawkins has the right spirit...and no, he is not necessarily more credible.

I was never a fan of Dawkins, he is too aggressive and it helps that he knows absolutely nothing about the Pope,-whom he spent a great amount of time criticising on Heaven and Earth, Christianity, or Jewish tradition.

Dawkins is overzealous.

I'm a historian. What I have seen in Christian-Scientific Religious theory throughout history is people bending over backwards trying to make the two mesh into some big TOE.

They've always failed, they will do so again, despite his nice and compromising Polkinghorne's may seem when viewed as an isolated incident.

And quite honestly, when Christians hypocritically ATTACK science, I share Dawkin's voracity.

What about when the people on this board profess to be follows of science then come out with some of the illogical rubbish seen on this thread? Alot of them don't know anything about evolution than what they saw on that science video one time...

Thats very true. Luckily some of us are actually scientists 13

Besides...there is no such thing as a "follower of science"

Originally posted by Alliance
Thats very true. Luckily some of us are actually scientists 13

Besides...there is no such thing as a "follower of science"

I didn't want to call them scientists...so I didn't know what to say, and evolutionists would be unfair because A-they dont know what it is, and B thats not what they profess to be.

Anyway, can you teach history?

"My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal; his days will be a hundred and twenty years."

Originally posted by FeceMan
"My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal; his days will be a hundred and twenty years."

So what happened?

Maximum human lifespan is 115-120 years.

Longest lived woman was a Frenchwoman who lived for 122 years.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Maximum human lifespan is 115-120 years.

Longest lived woman was a Frenchwoman who lived for 122 years.

On record.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Maximum human lifespan is 115-120 years.

Longest lived woman was a Frenchwoman who lived for 122 years.

So, why can't more people live that long? That was my question.

And god seemed to be off by a couple of years on that French chick. Or was he speaking only of man and not woman, who gets two more years because she's wasted that much of her life brushing her hair?

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
So, why can't more people live that long? That was my question.

And god seemed to be off by a couple of years on that French chick. Or was he speaking only of man and not woman, who gets two more years because she's wasted that much of her life brushing her hair?

Or maybe thats just a very silly little thing and pointless statement.