Ultimate Magneto vs. The Ultimates

Originally posted by David_Richards
If they wrote it like that then I guess he can, the writers get to decide whats real in the comics and whats not.

Comics aren't real, honey.

We don't argue against the writers. We argue who should logically win against another character.

By your innane thinking, Storm vs. Wonder Woman is canon because it was written to be that way. Oh and Wolverine can definitely beat Lobo because it was written that way.

And we can't judge Wolverine vs. Superman because it never happened in a comic.

We don't think that way. Only you think that way.

Originally posted by David_Richards
And grammer isn't an accurate example of intellect as you so elegantly prove.

No, you're obviously too unintelligent to think for yourself and come up with logical schemas of battles since you rely on comic events as a cruch.

Originally posted by Jesse7
Bottom line Ultimate Collosus > Ultimate Mags, fair and square regardless of what anyone says, call it PIS or not, its cannon.

Despite the fact that PIS is thrown out the window, and we look at high-end feats here. Not to mention the fact that Ultimate Magneto was dumbed down A LOT, and we don't even look at CIS/PIS filled stories... yeah, go ahead and believe it. 🙄

I'm gonna make a Spider-man vs. Firelord thread and say Spider-man wins even though it's PIS, and it's STRICTLY forbidden by the rules. 🙄 Please, don't be another fanboy. 😬

Originally posted by batdude123
Indeed.

Yep, they took everything cool about 616 Colossus, and threw it out and took the name and the powers of colossus and took a big turd on it and called it Ult. Collossus 😄

If it happened in the comics then they can.

Originally posted by David_Richards
If it happened in the comics then they can.

Jeese 😐

You are the kind of comics fan that got the industry ruined in the 90's

Originally posted by David_Richards
If it happened in the comics then they can.

I guess if it happened in the Bible, it also must have happened.

Yep, the world is only about two thousand years old....

You obviously can't think for yourself. The forum is about freedom of thought. You failed firsthand....

Originally posted by David_Richards
If it happened in the comics then they can.

And this is EXACTLY why you last long here, kid. 🙄

God, it's not even worthwhile to debate against people with no veracity. 🙄

Originally posted by Draco69
'
God, you're dull.

I guess if it happened in the Bible, it also must have happened.

Yep, the world is only about two thousand years old....

You obviously can't think for yourself. The forum is about freedom of thought. You failed firsthand....

Actually the bible never said the world is only 2000 years old, thats just when the caladaner was started from, because the time before Christ is irreleivent.

However I agree with you that not EVERYTHING in the bible is true

>_>

If you were arguing about 2 people in the bible then yes you would use it as the source material.

I prefer to win my debates using the facts form the source material not opinion and conjecture.

What is written in the comics is canon. Everything else is simply opinion.

Originally posted by David_Richards
If you were arguing about 2 people in the bible then yes you would use it as the source material.

I prefer to win my debates using the facts form the source material not opinion and conjecture.

What is written in the comics is canon. Everything else is simply opinion.

Forums are ABOUT opinion.....

🙄

Originally posted by David_Richards
If you were arguing about 2 people in the bible then yes you would use it as the source material.

I prefer to win my debates using the facts form the source material not opinion and conjecture.

What is written in the comics is canon. Everything else is simply opinion.

This thread is about debating and in debating you don't use opinion, you only use facts.

Originally posted by David_Richards
If it happened in the comics then they can.

We take comics as law, until they violate a character in a way that spits on said characters history.
Hence the word, continuity.
Its what keeps the characters true to their roots and established power levels.

See Darkseid.
Getting jobbed out to Superman hurt his rep, but Supermans worse.
Cuz everything he does now, gets scrutinized with the jobber filter.

Superman embarrassing Darky on his own spits on Darkseid's and Superman's shared history.
Their continuity was tossed aside.

Like, going by your views, if Batman started flying without aid, then we have to accept it as gospel, right?
But Batman has no powers.
He's a self made man.
And him suddenly going mach three is in strict violation of continuity.

But Batdude, Magneto getting thrashed by Colon like that isn't bad. Since they didn't have years of explicit ownings to violate.
It was hella stupid imo, but not pis, since pis is often used when continuity is bamboozled.

Originally posted by David_Richards
This thread is about debating and in debating you don't use opinion, you only use facts.

We use logic and facts.

Honey, let's talk Storm vs. Wonder Woman.

Storm beat Wonder Woman in Marvel vs. DC. It was written by the writers.

Would you agree that Storm would beat Wonder Woman?

😬

Originally posted by David_Richards
This thread is about debating and in debating you don't use opinion, you only use facts.

Even though facts presented by people of your stature are usually irreleivent and only backed up by bias opinions 😐

Originally posted by Draco69
We use logic and facts.

Honey, let's talk Storm vs. Wonder Woman.

Storm beat Wonder Woman in Marvel vs. DC. It was written by the writers.

Would you agree that Storm would beat Wonder Woman?

😬

Dont forget Wolverine beating Lobo 😆

You ethier debate and go by the facts of the events in the comics. Or you discard the facts and simply disscus. So which is it? Are you debating or disscussing?

Im agreeing with David that Collosus can take Mags again 1 on 1, people try to pull this PIS Card on me all the time espicially when im defending Supes or wolverine (who are very disliked on these forums).

I use well written arguments backed up by scans and feats, yet people come and try to entirely dismiss them as PIS, then claim their own rediculous feats as law.

Originally posted by UniOmni
But Batdude, Magneto getting thrashed by Colon like that isn't bad. Since they didn't have years of explicit ownings to violate.
It was hella stupid imo, but not pis, since pis is often used when continuity is bamboozled.

What are you talking about? It was HORRIBLE! I just showed scans that proved the writer was drunk of his ass when he wrote that fight. It WAS pis.

Originally posted by Jesse7
Im agreeing with David that Collosus can take Mags again 1 on 1, people try to pull this PIS Card on me all the time espicially when im defending Supes or wolverine (who are very disliked on these forums).

I use well written arguments backed up by scans and feats, yet people come and try to entirely dismiss them as PIS, then claim their own rediculous feats as law.

Magneto can simply strip Colossus of his steel skin or throw him into orbit.

We use facts, science and cold hard logic on this forum.

Wolverine has shown to beat the Hulk.

Hulk is shown to beating the snot out of the Avengers, Thor and Hercules.

So by THAT line of thought:

Wolverine>Avengers +Thor & Hercules.

Yeah....