The Living Tribunal v.s. Galactus (full-power) /w/ Ult. Nullifier

Started by galan77777777 pages

Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
I think something in your head snaped...

You are arguing about something that happend in a comic you havent even read.
You come without proof that suports you.

Mr. M is working his @$$ off scaning pages in comicbooks, yet you do not even try to understand.

If you want to argue about something you should at least have prepared back up. And absolutely read the comics.

im sooo sory, did i offend thanos the comic book guru?

Originally posted by galan7777777
im sooo sory, did i offend thanos the comic book guru?

Nah not really... However to me, your now one of the most ignorant members ever. In the future your statements will allways require proof.

Originally posted by galan7777777
as i said, im not debating that reed reALIGNED certain aspects to the multiverse, but he hardly possessed the knowledge to reCREATE a multiverse, if u can prove to me where reed actually says that he was going to destroy and then recreate the MULTIVERSE, then i will appologize

You have NO answer to HOW the MULTI-VERSE was Re-aligned?

And HOW ALL those UNIVERSES that were FALLING APART were REMADE?

And HOW ALL those GALACTUSES in so many UNIVERSES that DIED, were RESURRECTED?

Please, I await your solution this MULTIVERSAL INBALANCE.

And don't try and say by Destroying Abraxas in the Universe he Manifested because:

Exactly...Abraxas MANIFESTED WAY OUTSIDE the 616 UNIVERSE.

Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
Nah not really... However to me, your now one of the most ignorant members ever. In the future your statements will allways require proof.

Dude,

I couldn't agree with you more.

Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
Nah not really... However to me, your now one of the most ignorant members ever. In the future your statements will allways require proof.
as should yours, all u do is agree with ure idol......u provide no proof to anything u say

Originally posted by galan7777777
as should yours, all u do is agree with ure idol......u provide no proof to anything u say

You have problems understanding how it is... So you probobly mess yourself up some wierd theory in the future which contains more errors than plots in a non canon comic.

Originally posted by Thanos_THOTU
You have problems understanding how it is... So you probobly mess yourself up some wierd theory in the future which contains more errors than plots in a non canon comic.
wow, well as i said im done arguing with u guys, this will keeps going all day and personally i think its a dry subject

Originally posted by galan7777777
this will keeps going all day and personally i think its a dry subject

With your obtuseness, no doubt.

Let's see how much you know, you wnated to rise the beast now stand up.

You have NO answer to HOW the MULTI-VERSE was Re-aligned?

And HOW ALL those UNIVERSES that were FALLING APART were REMADE?

And HOW ALL those GALACTUSES in so many UNIVERSES that DIED, were RESURRECTED?

Please, I await your solution this MULTIVERSAL INBALANCE.

And don't try and say by Destroying Abraxas in the Universe he Manifested because:

Exactly...Abraxas MANIFESTED WAY OUTSIDE the 616 UNIVERSE.

Originally posted by Mr Master
With your obtuseness, no doubt.

Let's see how much you know, you wnated to rise the beast now stand up.

You have NO answer to HOW the MULTI-VERSE was Re-aligned?

And HOW ALL those UNIVERSES that were FALLING APART were REMADE?

And HOW ALL those GALACTUSES in so many UNIVERSES that DIED, were RESURRECTED?

Please, I await your solution this MULTIVERSAL INBALANCE.

And don't try and say by Destroying Abraxas in the Universe he Manifested because:

Exactly...Abraxas MANIFESTED WAY OUTSIDE the 616 UNIVERSE.

as i said this is a dry subject....... call it what u want to call it, but im done

Originally posted by galan7777777
call it what u want to call it, but im done

I'll just call it what Marvel does, as I always have, with on panel proof.

Amen... <letting this thread die>

Thank yaweh, hehe 😆 that was getting ridiculous seriously was it an argument or a friendly debate

Originally posted by invisiblewoman
was it an argument or a friendly debate

It was a lesson.

Originally posted by invisiblewoman
Thank yaweh, hehe 😆 that was getting ridiculous seriously was it an argument or a friendly debate
lol, too true

Originally posted by invisiblewoman
Thank yaweh, hehe 😆 that was getting ridiculous seriously was it an argument or a friendly debate

1, It's Yawhew.
2, He was ignorant and dense
3, He requested (-and got) proof, but he didn't prove anything himself.

Originally posted by Mr Master
It was a lesson.
aha... i see, hey i was wondering if you could tell me how to reply to multiple quotes at a time? i always see you doing it. and it seems like it would save U from a lot of unecessary clicking of the mouse

Originally posted by invisiblewoman
aha... i see, hey i was wondering if you could tell me how to reply to multiple quotes at a time? i always see you doing it. and it seems like it would save U from a lot of unecessary clicking of the mouse

Just highlight a quote and press Quote or write:
[qoute] hi [/qoute] (miss-spelled it in purpose so it would turn into a quote)

It will be something like this
It will be something like this

hey i did it.... thanks for the help

Since the UN is can clearly destroy the multiverse on the hand of Reed wouldn't it be fair to assume that in the hands of Galactus it would be exponetially more powerful?Since it's part of him shouldn't he be able to use it to even greater extents than all the others that have used it?