Sarah Connor Chronicles

Started by barand14 pages


Fox have released some nice looking posters for TSCC, although there is no John Connor, which is a shame I think.

Anyway click the following to see them (4 in total).

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20160052,00.html

For Australians interested in this series, it will on Channel Nine sometime over summer.

Another month and this will be on.

Just saw the pilot for the Sarah Connor Chronicles, and it sure has potential.

However I just got curious about a possible continuity error. Didn't Johns father in Terminator 1 say that (adding Spoiler tags incase none of those who read this have seen the pilot)

Spoiler:
it was no way to get a time machine to travel forward in time? I can understand that they want to have the series set in 2007, so they don't have to worry about mixing in stuff not created back in the 99.

Yes that is what I thought, but I guess it's another thing thats been overlooked.

Originally posted by barand1
I'm hoping this will turn out a good character piece and concentrate on the characters than the action (if any?).

This show looks F'ing stupid. Bet it gets cancelled after one season

Let it actually get on the air before throwing stones at it.

This airs next sunday, then monday. Looks good

I'll be watching.

Doesn't this show contradict terminator 3?

In T3 when John was like "No, no, you shouldn't even be here, we stopped judment day".

he was all suprised, now if this show gets considered to be cannon, he shouldn't be.

Apparently it has already aired and people are not too impressed...

I absolutely loved the show. I can't wait for tonight's episode.

Sarah Connor is the Queen in 2007's "300" film.

Originally posted by OB1-adobe
Doesn't this show contradict terminator 3?

In T3 when John was like "No, no, you shouldn't even be here, we stopped judgement day". He was all suprised, now if this show gets considered to be canon, he shouldn't be.

You're right - the "Sarah Connor Chronicles" does indeed completely contradict "T3" (and in more ways than just the one you mentioned). The producers of the show have admitted as much, explaining that, for the purposes of their series, "T3" has been disregarded entirely (with only "T1" and "T2" considered canon). Apparently, they have justified this move by saying that the "Terminator" series has already shown us that the idea of alternate futures is possible.

From a storytelling view, this certainly makes sense; after all, according to "T3", not a lot actually happened between "T2" and "T3", other than John going on the run, and Sarah dying from leukaemia - events that would hardly make for a compelling series!

As for the issue of canon, it appears that now only "T1" and "T2" are actually strictly canon, with the TV series and movies having differing canons concerning the events taking place thereafter; even though the TV series is disregarding "T3", "T4" will indeed consider its events (and not those of the "Sarah Connor Chronicles"😉 to be canon, and will follow on from them.

Originally posted by Ahnold
You're right - the "Sarah Connor Chronicles" does indeed completely contradict "T3" (and in more ways than just the one you mentioned). The producers of the show have admitted as much, explaining that, for the purposes of their series, "T3" has been disregarded entirely (with only "T1" and "T2" considered canon). Apparently, they have justified this move by saying that the "Terminator" series has already shown us that the idea of alternate futures is possible.

From a storytelling view, this certainly makes sense; after all, according to "T3", not a lot actually happened between "T2" and "T3", other than John going on the run, and Sarah dying from leukaemia - events that would hardly make for a compelling series!

As for the issue of canon, it appears that now only "T1" and "T2" are actually strictly canon, with the TV series and movies having differing canons concerning the events taking place thereafter; even though the TV series is disregarding "T3", "T4" will indeed consider its events (and not those of the "Sarah Connor Chronicles"😉 to be canon, and will follow on from them.

why would they do that? I have an intrest to watch the show, but I doubt it will last one season

i thought for a tv show it was ****ing awsome. it does refer to t3 in alot of ways but still. im definatley excited for tonights episode

This was pretty tight. I'm really exited for this the same way I was waiting for next week so I could see the next Blade episode. It contradicts with T3 but not alot of people care much for T3 anyway. I though for a tv show it was aweswome. I'll be watching again tonight for sure.

Originally posted by Darth Martin
This was pretty tight. I'm really exited for this the same way I was waiting for next week so I could see the next Blade episode. It contradicts with T3 but not alot of people care much for T3 anyway. I though for a tv show it was aweswome. I'll be watching again tonight for sure.

t3 was good but you cant touch the first 2 films though. i thought this series was gona suck teribly but thank you god i was wrong.

Originally posted by P23
t3 was good but you cant touch the first 2 films though. i thought this series was gona suck teribly but thank you god i was wrong.
😉

We are still waiting here in Australia for the series to screen. Only six weeks of summer to go, and no word from the TV people yet...