The rebel scums vs Mandalorians

OK, so here we go. First off, the guys arguing for the Mandies side sound like they are proud graduates of the Borat Sackdijev University of English. Their arguments are pretty much "ooouah. Mandalorainz are tehy tuoghest EVAR! Who thiks deos stoopid Reballs vill last one sekond against the mighty mandalorianz?" You are SEVERLY underestimating the Rebels.

Mr Kreiger seems to think that the die-hard rough-shed state for the rebels is a weakness with their inferior tech and numbers to the Empire, when in reality it is both a weakness and a strength.

The Rebels fought against the Galactic Empire, which from what has been released so far has shown us that the Imperials had pretty much the largest military force that is commonly known. Their army numbered in the HUNDRED MILLIONS via simple reasoning of the territory and populations under their control, if not the several BILLIONS. The rebels could only muster a VERY small fraction of that. And reinforcements were less frequent as the Imperials had conscription, recruiting openly etc etc etc. And medicinal supplies were harder to come by, as if a stormtrooper was wounded, he could be evac'd to a base for bacta, due to the Empire's control of all the "bacta worlds." The rebels had to use smuggled/stolen/improvised medicine, which shows that they are resourceful and would do BETTER on average than the Empire if they used identical medicine.

The Imperials had better weapons, but the Rebels often (though not ALWAYS, I will concede that) used their weapons to greater effect. In one instance, it is noted that due to careful planning, they held off a force over three times their size. They also had PLENTY of talent. Bren Derlin, Lando Calrissian, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Akbar, Jan Dodonna, to name the most well known. These guys knew their **** on tactics.

For you beloved Mandalorians, there is only one great tacticians who I can name after a long time of thinking. That would be Canderous Ordo. I do not doubt that the Mandalorians have many skilled warriors, but again, there is no telling about great strategic thinkers.

I am unsure about the scenario's outcome, and THAT is partially because the host is vauge. WHAT REBELS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? THE TRILOGY ONES, OR THE ONES SHORTLY BEFORE THEY BECAME THE NEW REPUBLIC? Do the Mandalorians include the Tuang, the Neo-Crusaders, the ones under Alpha-02, the ones loyal to Jango, ALL THESE NEED TO BE ANSWERED! I await the response.

i dont get how the imperials lost, wasnt it cause they lost there nerve after they found out palpatine died.

Originally posted by Tortoise Herder
OK, so here we go. First off, the guys arguing for the Mandies side sound like they are proud graduates of the Borat Sackdijev University of English. Their arguments are pretty much "ooouah. Mandalorainz are tehy tuoghest EVAR! Who thiks deos stoopid Reballs vill last one sekond against the mighty mandalorianz?" You are SEVERLY underestimating the Rebels.

Mr Kreiger seems to think that the die-hard rough-shed state for the rebels is a weakness with their inferior tech and numbers to the Empire, when in reality it is both a weakness and a strength.

The Rebels fought against the Galactic Empire, which from what has been released so far has shown us that the Imperials had pretty much the largest military force that is commonly known. Their army numbered in the HUNDRED MILLIONS via simple reasoning of the territory and populations under their control, if not the several BILLIONS. The rebels could only muster a VERY small fraction of that. And reinforcements were less frequent as the Imperials had conscription, recruiting openly etc etc etc. And medicinal supplies were harder to come by, as if a stormtrooper was wounded, he could be evac'd to a base for bacta, due to the Empire's control of all the "bacta worlds." The rebels had to use smuggled/stolen/improvised medicine, which shows that they are resourceful and would do BETTER on average than the Empire if they used identical medicine.

The Imperials had better weapons, but the Rebels often (though not ALWAYS, I will concede that) used their weapons to greater effect. In one instance, it is noted that due to careful planning, they held off a force over three times their size. They also had PLENTY of talent. Bren Derlin, Lando Calrissian, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Akbar, Jan Dodonna, to name the most well known. These guys knew their **** on tactics.

For you beloved Mandalorians, there is only one great tacticians who I can name after a long time of thinking. That would be Canderous Ordo. I do not doubt that the Mandalorians have many skilled warriors, but again, there is no telling about great strategic thinkers.

I am unsure about the scenario's outcome, and THAT is partially because the host is vauge. WHAT REBELS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? THE TRILOGY ONES, OR THE ONES SHORTLY BEFORE THEY BECAME THE NEW REPUBLIC? Do the Mandalorians include the Tuang, the Neo-Crusaders, the ones under Alpha-02, the ones loyal to Jango, ALL THESE NEED TO BE ANSWERED! I await the response.

Originally posted by Tortoise Herder
OK, so here we go. First off, the guys arguing for the Mandies side sound like they are proud graduates of the Borat Sackdijev University of English. Their arguments are pretty much "ooouah. Mandalorainz are tehy tuoghest EVAR! Who thiks deos stoopid Reballs vill last one sekond against the mighty mandalorianz?" You are SEVERLY underestimating the Rebels.

Mr Kreiger seems to think that the die-hard rough-shed state for the rebels is a weakness with their inferior tech and numbers to the Empire, when in reality it is both a weakness and a strength.

The Rebels fought against the Galactic Empire, which from what has been released so far has shown us that the Imperials had pretty much the largest military force that is commonly known. Their army numbered in the HUNDRED MILLIONS via simple reasoning of the territory and populations under their control, if not the several BILLIONS. The rebels could only muster a VERY small fraction of that. And reinforcements were less frequent as the Imperials had conscription, recruiting openly etc etc etc. And medicinal supplies were harder to come by, as if a stormtrooper was wounded, he could be evac'd to a base for bacta, due to the Empire's control of all the "bacta worlds." The rebels had to use smuggled/stolen/improvised medicine, which shows that they are resourceful and would do BETTER on average than the Empire if they used identical medicine.

The Imperials had better weapons, but the Rebels often (though not ALWAYS, I will concede that) used their weapons to greater effect. In one instance, it is noted that due to careful planning, they held off a force over three times their size. They also had PLENTY of talent. Bren Derlin, Lando Calrissian, Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, Akbar, Jan Dodonna, to name the most well known. These guys knew their **** on tactics.

For you beloved Mandalorians, there is only one great tacticians who I can name after a long time of thinking. That would be Canderous Ordo. I do not doubt that the Mandalorians have many skilled warriors, but again, there is no telling about great strategic thinkers.

I am unsure about the scenario's outcome, and THAT is partially because the host is vauge. WHAT REBELS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? THE TRILOGY ONES, OR THE ONES SHORTLY BEFORE THEY BECAME THE NEW REPUBLIC? Do the Mandalorians include the Tuang, the Neo-Crusaders, the ones under Alpha-02, the ones loyal to Jango, ALL THESE NEED TO BE ANSWERED! I await the response.

🤣 😮‍💨

Mandalorians win

While Mandalorians are better warriors and know warfare, tactics better then anyone in their time, except for Revan, the Rebels have 4000 years
newer technology and the tactics Mandalorians used could have ben perfected, so if the Mandalorians win it wont be easy.

It is stated that the technology in the SW universe is very similar in every era, maybe slightly different, but not enough to make the difference. That's why they were able to do KOTOR and KOTOR2 even though it is 4000 yrs beofore the rise of the empire. Or do you really see any change in technology in the games compared with the movies?

Originally posted by Riverollv
It is stated that the technology in the SW universe is very similar in every era, maybe slightly different, but not enough to make the difference. That's why they were able to do KOTOR and KOTOR2 even though it is 4000 yrs beofore the rise of the empire. Or do you really see any change in technology in the games compared with the movies?

... Do you know happen to know what the Death Star is?

Yes, yes i know that, I'm just saying what I read somewhere, though i dont remember where... if I remember the website I'll post it.
I understand why you told me this, but if you do not count the Death Star, what other differences do you see?

The size of other ships...

The size, power, speed, shield strength.

No no, technology didn't change at all.