Legal System

OK, heres a scenario:

Two people are in litigation, I'll call them person A and person B. They both have their own lawyers though one, person A is hacking into the others Internet to get the scoop on person B. Person B has been discussing strategies with his lawyer. Person B just found out and reported it to the authorities. Now this really isn't considered wire tapping because it is the Internet. So what is the legal system going to charge person A with?

Originally posted by debbiejo
OK, heres a scenario:

Two people are in litigation, I'll call them person A and person B. They both have their own lawyers though one, person A is hacking into the others Internet to get the scoop on person B. Person B has been discussing strategies with his lawyer. Person B just found out and reported it to the authorities. Now this really isn't considered wire tapping because it is the Internet. So what is the legal system going to charge person A with?

Most likely nothing, since the information was gained ilegally.

That is of course, if we're dealing with a clean police department that is above planting evidence.

No body likes my new thread....... 🙁

Are they discussing strategies in person? Or over the Net, which wouldnt make sense considering thats usually what people dont do when it comes to cases.

No no..........One person is spying on the other through the net.......they are reading emails from the other side to get a heads up. They are disrupting the natural process of the court system. Due process.

What the hell...............People don't have any idea???

Originally posted by debbiejo
What the hell...............People don't have any idea???

Yes I do, don't waste your money on an attorney, let it go🙂

FU Mr...... 😛

Communications between a lawyer and his client are confidential. I don't know what, exactly, A would be charged with, but it would certainly be illegal, and it would lose A the case for him.

It would seem to me this also, but what could be he charge in the legal system..............btw, this is a real scenario for someone I do know.........

Originally posted by debbiejo
No no..........One person is spying on the other through the net.......they are reading emails from the other side to get a heads up. They are disrupting the natural process of the court system. Due process.

If someone is hacking into someone elses emails, and reading private material, that is certainly a crime, whether it's the internet or not. There'd be charges, although I am not sure exactly what those charges would be.

Originally posted by debbiejo
OK, heres a scenario:

Two people are in litigation, I'll call them person A and person B. They both have their own lawyers though one, person A is hacking into the others Internet to get the scoop on person B. Person B has been discussing strategies with his lawyer. Person B just found out and reported it to the authorities. Now this really isn't considered wire tapping because it is the Internet. So what is the legal system going to charge person A with?

I'm sure this is some kind of computer crime, somewhere in the books.

I told you why I changed my mind
I got bored by playing with time
I know you thought you had me nailed
But I've freed my head from your garden rails

Now it's a legal matter, baby
You got me on the run
It's a legal matter, baby
A legal matter from now on

Originally posted by debbiejo
OK, heres a scenario:

Two people are in litigation, I'll call them person A and person B. They both have their own lawyers though one, person A is hacking into the others Internet to get the scoop on person B. Person B has been discussing strategies with his lawyer. Person B just found out and reported it to the authorities. Now this really isn't considered wire tapping because it is the Internet. So what is the legal system going to charge person A with?

edit

You said Person B was being hacked and it was a "he."

Oh, sorry. Person A was hacking into person B....Person A is a male...

I'm glad you cleared that up. For a second there, I thought you were going to have to be logging in from Prison.

The new evidence would be inadmissible, because of the right of Discovery, procedures by which one party may obtain information revelent to the case ...

OK, let's speak some shit.

Begin...