Is the Dark Side really bad?

Originally posted by Nikkolas
look at Dooku. Dooku became a Sith to get rid of the worthless Republic Senate which had been oppressing people for years and doing absolutely nothing to help those they "represented." He dreamed of an government where power rested in a benevolent dictator who would act for the people.

I am yet to see evidence of any dictatorship being "benevolent".

Dooku ceased to exist when he became sith. Therefore there was no longer any benevolence to him, more like malevolence.

We're talking about the same Dooku who created Grievous with the specific purpose to genocide and butcher countless civilians simply to provide Dooku with a 'get out of jail free' card?

Exactly

As stated no longer benevolent only malevolent.

I think if one were to approach to the dark side with full self-awareness of the effects it could have, but with reserved and mindful use,it wouldn't be that bad. Revan, Kyle Katarn and Mace Windu are proof.

This thread is a decade old.

Woah...

Only Neph remembers it.

I was seeing the cool kids casting thread necromancy on a bunch of versus threads and got the impression that it was no longer a forbidden spell . . . 😕

nuu, it's a very bad thing to do

u have defiled the natural order