Chick Tracts and the Bible why the discrimination?

Started by lil bitchiness39 pages
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Hmm, Chick is a creepy, reclusive racist who uses disproven crap to get his points across and can't draw to save his life. If he wants to make the world a better place, he should stab his pen through his femoral artery

Its just pure propaganda.

To some of in Europe, kind of thing said and believed by certain North Americans is just as staggering.

Im not trying to be offencive, but its kind of the same connotation.

Well, to many...its staggering here in the New World too.

Im sure it has to be. Perhaps even more furstrating.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Its just pure propaganda.

To some of in Europe, kind of thing said and believed by certain North Americans is just as staggering.

Im not trying to be offencive, but its kind of the same connotation.

I agree.

JIA, when you posted biblical quotes, you atleast proved you had an extensive knowledge of biblical text, and could flexibly apply your Biblical knowledge to different "moral" scenarios.

But when you just started posting Chick Tracts, I took your arguments and you Faith less and less seriously...

Originally posted by FeceMan
I've no idea about what you are babbling.

Of course you don't. Just because you were the one who brought up the death penalty in Jewish law ... I mean, that was over a day ago! Who can remember stuff that far back?

Originally posted by FeceMan
OHH SNAP LORD URIZEN WITH THE ZING
Well yeah.......kinda true when it comes to historical things................sorry...

Originally posted by Gregory
Of course you don't. Just because you were the one who brought up the death penalty in Jewish law ... I mean, that was over a day ago! Who can remember stuff that far back?

I suppose if you had put it in context we wouldn't be in this situation.
Originally posted by debbiejo
Well yeah.......kinda true when it comes to historical things................sorry...

Gee, I guess I'd have to be an agnostic for my ability to admit what I don't know to be appreciated.

Originally posted by FeceMan
IGee, I guess I'd have to be an agnostic for my ability to admit what I don't know to be appreciated.
Well I appreciate you and you knowledge, but this whole field of religion is very vast. (sp?)

Originally posted by FeceMan
Gee, I guess I'd have to be an agnostic for my ability to admit what I don't know to be appreciated.

Yeah. Something we agree on.

*Glares at debbie/Regret*

Originally posted by FeceMan
Gee, I guess I'd have to be an agnostic for my ability to admit what I don't know to be appreciated.

1) This is the first time you admit that you don't know whether your Religion is factual or not.

2) As I've seen it, Fecesman, you lack appreciation for most opinions that question, challenge, or attack Christianity. I recall you referring to those who oppose Christianity as "morons".

Originally posted by Alliance
Yeah. Something we agree on.

*Glares at debbie/Regret*

?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Gee, I guess I'd have to be an agnostic for my ability to admit what I don't know to be appreciated.

No, it is merely the trademark of the agnostic to admit it.

As a Christian I would say it would be a near miracle for a person to be that way... 🙄

j/k

Originally posted by Regret
?

YOur post in the "i admire _____ about (insert religion here thread)"

I take offense to that. 🙂 But I cant say so in lil's "let make the religion forum nice again initiative threads"

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
1) This is the first time you admit that you don't know whether your Religion is factual or not.

2) As I've seen it, Fecesman, you lack appreciation for most opinions that question, challenge, or attack Christianity. I recall you referring to those who oppose Christianity as "morons".


1. I did not admit that it was not factual. I have, on multiple occasions, admitted not to knowing things.

2. You need your eyes checked.

Originally posted by FeceMan
1. I did not admit that it was not factual. I have, on multiple occasions, admitted not to knowing things.

2. You need your eyes checked.

1) To claim your Faith as fact is saying that you know it is true. To admit that you do now know is to decline from calling your Faith "factual".

2) You need to make sure you don't have Amnesia

Originally posted by FeceMan
I suppose if you had put it in context we wouldn't be in this situation.

In other words, "It's your fault for not holding my hand!" Right. I'll try not to over-estimate you in the future.

I wondor if JesusIsAlive feels he has successfully carried out his missions of enlightening our spirits.

I don't think he does.

I have a theory about JesusIsAlive. Well, my first theory is that he's a troll, but I have a secondary theory. JIA doesn't think of himself as a missinary; he thinks of himself as a martyr, Here he is, a poor persecuted Christian, spreading the Word of God to all of us evil heathens in spite of our ridicule and scorn! Truly, a devote Christian. He doesn't want to convert anyone, he wants his fundamentalist Christian persecution complex validated.

WHOA...there were like forty seven theories in there.

1. Troll. Likely.
2. Martyr. Impossible...he's not dead. e-Martyr wannabe?
3. Unstable psycho seeking spiritual validation. Also likely.