Originally posted by quanchi112Who the hell said anything about page 6? That's a subforum run by Tom Brevoort. Do you know who Tom Brevoort is? Did you even bother clicking the link? I know you clicked the first one, but what about the second?
i see nothing officail on page 6 of this. marvel sites are official not someone claiming to be an editor on some comic book forum. do u believe everything in this forum?
Originally posted by quanchi112What if it's from an official Marvel editor? Tom Brevoort's the Senior Editor at Marvel.
im saying if its not an official marvel site then that doesnt mean jack. i have the comic book supporting what i have said and he says he has a comic book forum stating marvels official stance.
Originally posted by quanchi112You haven't proven anything...and what the hell does 'pawn' mean?
yes i have two scnas proving that the end was canon from thanos series issue one while this guy disgarees becuz of this random comic book forum.i have pawned him so many times.
It seriously amazes me that you're allowed to continue posting...the standards around here have really dropped. Big time.
Originally posted by Lord SYou still are acting as if an internet forum constitutes as ironclad evidence when we both know that it doesnt. My scan in an actual comic book is ironclad evidence. Unless you show me something about marvel taking an official stance then you really have nothing.
Who the hell said anything about page 6? That's a subforum run by Tom Brevoort. Do you know who Tom Brevoort is? Did you even bother clicking the link? I know you clicked the first one, but what about the second?What if it's from an official Marvel editor? Tom Brevoort's the Senior Editor at Marvel.
You haven't proven anything...and what the hell does 'pawn' mean?
It seriously amazes me that you're allowed to continue posting...the standards around here have really dropped. Big time.
Remember when you look at my scan it proves my whole argument and describes what actually happened in the end and how i ended. It explained that thanos lived. It answered all your questions while your reasoning really doesnt answer a thing.
What happened then exactly in your opinion? What was thanos referencing in issue one if it wasnt the end?
I know it was the end but im curious as to what u think it is referencing here.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirlonslaught faced hulk an dmany others. it wasnt like they had a duel and fought for keeps like when ds lost to superman. there is a difference here.
\I said nothing of the Omega Effect. I said the Omega. And Onslaught is not essential to the Universe. Onslaught was broken apart by hulk's fist.
DS is stronger than the Hulk and faster.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You still are acting as if an internet forum constitutes as ironclad evidence when we both know that it doesnt. My scan in an actual comic book is ironclad evidence. Unless you show me something about marvel taking an official stance then you really have nothing.Remember when you look at my scan it proves my whole argument and describes what actually happened in the end and how i ended. It explained that thanos lived. It answered all your questions while your reasoning really doesnt answer a thing.
What happened then exactly in your opinion? What was thanos referencing in issue one if it wasnt the end?
I know it was the end but im curious as to what u think it is referencing here.
Wow. For a moment there, quanchi actually used grammar.
Originally posted by quanchi112
it wasnt like they had a duel and fought for keeps.
😕
Originally posted by Evil_Ashthat was after he had put up with all the opposition. u would have a case if they were alone. onslaught still opposed everyone. its not like he just challenged hulk and that was that.
Wow. For a moment there, quanchi actually used grammar.😕
i can use grammar every now and again but this is an internet forum and i dont feel it is necessary.
Originally posted by quanchi112This is getting beyond nauseating...it's like talking to a fricken dog who keeps barking at you cause he doesn't understand.
You still are acting as if an internet forum constitutes as ironclad evidence when we both know that it doesnt. My scan in an actual comic book is ironclad evidence. Unless you show me something about marvel taking an official stance then you really have nothing.Remember when you look at my scan it proves my whole argument and describes what actually happened in the end and how i ended. It explained that thanos lived. It answered all your questions while your reasoning really doesnt answer a thing.
What happened then exactly in your opinion? What was thanos referencing in issue one if it wasnt the end?
I know it was the end but im curious as to what u think it is referencing here.
Ok...for the slow-minded...
At the time of publication, Jim Starlin wrote Thanos referencing the events of 'The End'.
Tom Brevoort, his superior, acknowledged Thanos' remembering of 'The End', but because he's the senior editor, he struck down the on-panel evidence by saying Thanos was remembering 'some event' that beared resemblence to 'The End'. Because of his position at Marvel, his word is above that of Starlin, (and Thanos...because he's not really real).
Your scan of 'iron-clad evidence' written by a writer can and has been overruled by the editor...who didn't really change anything aside from reasserting the original premise: that all 'The End' type stories were set out-of-continuity. Whether Brevoort says it on a 3rd party owned message forum, at a comicon, or even at Marvel.com, doesn't matter.
So that's the policy that's been set by Marvel brass.
Why you insist on taking the conspiracy theory route of, "oh that's somebody pretending to be a Marvel editor", is just beyond me. Where is the logic? The internet's a big place...and these editors are known for getting themselves involved with the fan-base by fielding questions about big events, (ie. Schmidt and Brevoort were both at CBR interacting directly with fans about 'Annihilation' and 'Civil War'😉, and making their presence known by hosting subforums themselves as part of larger forums, (ie. Ron Marz is on CBR, and as stated before, Brevoort is on Comixfan). Why would anybody pretend to be these people...I mean, really? Think about it...they are not world famous celebs.
So the bottom line is that no matter what Starlin said/showed in a comicbook, the executive decision stands. 'Marvel: The End' is not canon.
Time to come to grips with it.
As for what exactly happened? That's a question you should ask Marvel directly.
Remember Xorn? At the time he was revealed to be Magneto...and until this day I don't believe any on-panel evidence has retconned that. But we know he wasn't Xorn because Marvel brass came out and said so. Probably on a message forum.
Originally posted by Lord SOk iI have tried reasoning with you but i have to keep repeating myself. Show me something official that states that the end wasnt canon. An internet forum would be scoffed at as a source by any college professor as the internet is not credible unto itself.
This is getting beyond nauseating...it's like talking to a fricken dog who keeps barking at you cause he doesn't understand.Ok...for the slow-minded...
At the time of publication, Jim Starlin wrote Thanos referencing the events of 'The End'.
Tom Brevoort, his superior, acknowledged Thanos' remembering of 'The End', but because he's the senior editor, he struck down the on-panel evidence by saying Thanos was remembering 'some event' that beared resemblence to 'The End'. Because of his position at Marvel, his word is above that of Starlin, (and Thanos...because he's not really real).
Your scan of 'iron-clad evidence' written by a writer can and has been overruled by the editor...who didn't really change anything aside from reasserting the original premise: that all 'The End' type stories were set out-of-continuity. Whether Brevoort says it on a 3rd party owned message forum, at a comicon, or even at Marvel.com, doesn't matter.
So that's the policy that's been set by Marvel brass.
Why you insist on taking the conspiracy theory route of, "oh that's somebody pretending to be a Marvel editor", is just beyond me. Where is the logic? The internet's a big place...and these editors are known for getting themselves involved with the fan-base by fielding questions about big events, (ie. Schmidt and Brevoort were both at CBR interacting directly with fans about 'Annihilation' and 'Civil War'😉, and making their presence known by hosting subforums themselves as part of larger forums, (ie. Ron Marz is on CBR, and as stated before, Brevoort is on Comixfan). Why would anybody pretend to be these people...I mean, really? Think about it...they are not world famous celebs.
So the bottom line is that no matter what Starlin said/showed in a comicbook, the executive decision stands. 'Marvel: The End' is not canon.
Time to come to grips with it.
As for what exactly happened? That's a question you should ask Marvel directly.
Remember Xorn? At the time he was revealed to be Magneto...and until this day I don't believe any on-panel evidence has retconned that. But we know he wasn't Xorn because Marvel brass came out and said so. Probably on a message forum.
I dont have to ask marvel what happened as i know with my reasoning and what the comic books tell me. Thanos said he had the heart which he obtained in the end, in thanos issue one he stated he had the heart. This thanos the one from 616 stated this in his own series. Unless you have an official link or a comic denouncing this then you have nothing. My theory explains all while yours is full of loopholes.
You cant explain to me anything of the event while i can tell you the whole story. Thanos said he stumbled upon the heart and became supreme. Thanos restarted the universe fixing the flaw and remained alive but warlock knew this the whole time.
On panel evidence is credible as compared to a supposed editor who is not saying this on an official marvel site. How do i know this editor is speaking anyways?
Can youu prove it was him?
I can prove what my theory is by an official marvel comic book.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Ok iI have tried reasoning with you but i have to keep repeating myself. Show me something official that states that the end wasnt canon. An internet forum would be scoffed at as a source by any college professor as the internet is not credible unto itself.I dont have to ask marvel what happened as i know with my reasoning and what the comic books tell me. Thanos said he had the heart which he obtained in the end, in thanos issue one he stated he had the heart. This thanos the one from 616 stated this in his own series. Unless you have an official link or a comic denouncing this then you have nothing. My theory explains all while yours is full of loopholes.
You cant explain to me anything of the event while i can tell you the whole story. Thanos said he stumbled upon the heart and became supreme. Thanos restarted the universe fixing the flaw and remained alive but warlock knew this the whole time.
On panel evidence is credible as compared to a supposed editor who is not saying this on an official marvel site. How do i know this editor is speaking anyways?
Can youu prove it was him?
I can prove what my theory is by an official marvel comic book.
Leo already stated along time ago that it wasn't cannon. ANd then I said it as well. But you just won't accept it. The event hasn't happened in marvel cannon. ALL of the End series aren't cannon.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirlit was referenced in a comic book. so i dont care what anyone says becuz comic books decide what is canon and what isntnot posters on here.
Leo already stated along time ago that it wasn't cannon. ANd then I said it as well. But you just won't accept it. The event hasn't happened in marvel cannon. ALL of the End series aren't cannon.
Originally posted by quanchi112Can you prove 9/11 really happened?
On panel evidence is credible as compared to a supposed editor who is not saying this on an official marvel site. How do i know this editor is speaking anyways?Can youu prove it was him?
I can prove what my theory is by an official marvel comic book.
Can you prove the earth is round?
Can you prove the moon is real?
Etc, etc, etc...you are seriously one retarded individual. Now you compare yourself to a college professor, too? I show you real proof and you brush it aside because you just accept it. Why not take Thanos' dick out of your mouth for a sec and realize that Marvel doesn't revolve around him.
You're a helpless myopic Thanos fanboy, who gives real Thanos fans like us a bad name. Not to mention an utter imbecile who I wish would just go away. KMC was fine before you and doesn't need you clogging up it arteries with your senseless stupidity.
Somebody call armandovalles and tell him all is forgiven...the new mayor of Idiotsville has arrived. See armando was an idiot...but at least he had heart. You on the other hand are just a plain idiot.
Originally posted by Lord S
Can you prove 9/11 really happened?Can you prove the earth is round?
Can you prove the moon is real?
Etc, etc, etc...you are seriously one retarded individual. Now you compare yourself to a college professor, too? I show you real proof and you brush it aside because you just accept it. Why not take Thanos' dick out of your mouth for a sec and realize that Marvel doesn't revolve around him.
You're a helpless myopic Thanos fanboy, who gives real Thanos fans like us a bad name. Not to mention an utter imbecile who I wish would just go away. KMC was fine before you and doesn't need you clogging up it arteries with your senseless stupidity.
Somebody call armandovalles and tell him all is forgiven...the new mayor of Idiotsville has arrived. See armando was an idiot...but at least he had heart. You on the other hand are just a plain idiot.
can we be best freinds. 😆 😆 😆
Your words are so beautiful and poetic.