Originally posted by Superboy Prime
I read it long ago and he could always edit the FAQs. Also I don't really think it's canon just because he says it is. But to each his own I guess.
It isn't canon because he says so, it's canon because what he says can be verified by looking at his sources. I could post them all if you like and you could research it.
Originally posted by shin_remy
HOHOHOIt is not created by tiamat, he HELPED him creating this FAQ to discribe it in english, same as some toher guys.
Emperor Ashtar : how big is your FAQ? and where did you get it. I see now that some other guys have posted some stuff of that FAQ at Shoryuken.com
The FAQ was created by saiki, sano, tiamt with help from: golden dragon,vasili,etc.
It's the same plot guide many people use. I'm still waiting for your plot guide, the one where you claimed ryu beat gill and oro watched.
that is an old source that i can't find back.
BUT in that faq are also some other things from that old source that i had used back in those days.
Only that of Ryu vs Gill isn't in the Faq
and info about the Fight between Urien and Ken isn't in the faq, but other stuf is wel in the Faq
the old source is gone it was www.perfectanime.net
And why do keep bringing this back. You really think youre the man. But youre not. everything you say is right and everything that somebody else say is wrong.
Everybody must agree with you. Well i tell you what
I have readed MORE sf story's then you and i have more stuff then you. Next year i'm going to Japan
Originally posted by shin_remy
that is an old source that i can't find back.BUT in that faq are also some other things from that old source that i had used back in those days.
Only that of Ryu vs Gill isn't in the Faq
and info about the Fight between Urien and Ken isn't in the faq, but other stuf is wel in the Faqthe old source is gone it was www.perfectanime.net
And why do keep bringing this back. You really think youre the man. But youre not. everything you say is right and everything that somebody else say is wrong.
Everybody must agree with you. Well i tell you what
I have readed MORE sf story's then you and i have more stuff then you. Next year i'm going to Japan
Man that post was hilarious, first of all the plot guide does mention ken fighting urien. And I thought you lived in japan?
You made up a claim and now you can't back it up (Ryu fighting gill)
hilarious.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Man that post was hilarious, first of all the plot guide does mention ken fighting urien. And I thought you lived in japan?You made up a claim and now you can't back it up (Ryu fighting gill)
hilarious.
I noticed -_- That could be due to a few things. Perhaps it's a
retcon. Or Capcom of today doesn't know what it's talking about. Or
perhaps they've had to take that stance now that they sold the license
to Street Fighter to Capcom of America. Regardless, Capcom said
it and the plot guide has to go by Capcom's word in that respect that it
is the case NOW. It was not, however, the case in the past, as many
many MANY official sources stated otherwise. Of course, if all the
games are their own separate entities in terms of story, there wouldn't
be any point to the plot guide in the first place, so for the sake of
this guide having a point to existing, it will be pretending that all
the games are interconnected even though that isn't the case (it will
not, however, be denying that the games are separate any longer, though.
...I'm not going to go searching through the guide editting all past
statements to that effect though. That'll take forever). ...what
I'm wondering is why Capcom would tell Udon that Rival Schools is
supposedly set in the same universe as Street Fighter and then say
every Street Fighter game is within their own continuity and thus
universe. ...mweh.
Possibly Capcom said it because Okamoto and Funamizu where gone by
then. Those two (responsible for a lot of SF's story and design)
were still with Capcom when SF2 Revival and Final Fight One were
made, so...
Exact Quote:
Udoneko: Actually.... in the beginning, Capcom told me that EVERY GAME
is like a little alternate reality type of thing. So there is no real
history to the time line that they follow die hard. That is why when we
try to put together our comic story, we are taking elements from different
games that we beileve will best fit together in order to make a story that
make sense. Who met who, who dies, who lives.... those type of things....."
Maybe Capcom simply treats canon really loosely. Miyamoto claims there
isn't a Mario canon either even though many of the games do have bits
and pieces that lead up to each other while also not following anything
super-strictly. It's not like Capcom following its own canon to a T
was ever claimed by the guide, anyways (quite the contrary. Look at
all the retcons Capcom is constantly taking). There's also Udon's
"In the beginning" remark, whatever that means.
Of note is that there IS an official 'timeline' of sorts (IE, SFA3 taking
place 3 years before SF2 is official. Or was, last I checked), and for
there to be an official timeline would require all the games being in the
same continuity alone, really. That and... why the heck would Capcom
state in All About Capcom that Haggar stopped being mayor "2 years after
SFA3" if they weren't within the same continuity, anyways? Wouldn't they
use something like a Final Fight game to gauge the relativity of how many
years before or after a game Haggar stopped being mayor? Wouldn't it not
matter when Haggar stopped being mayor out of game if all the games were
separate continuities from each other anyways where Haggar could be mayor
in one set of continuities but not mayor in another? Haggar isn't even
MENTIONED in Street Fighter Alpha 3 for crying out loud, and yet Capcom
used that as their gauge for when he stopped being mayor.
Seriously, how can the games not be connected at least loosely? I can
easily put together a little logic-based proof of that based on stuff
found within the games themselves.
Originally posted by shin_remy
I noticed -_- That could be due to a few things. Perhaps it's a
retcon. Or Capcom of today doesn't know what it's talking about. Or
perhaps they've had to take that stance now that they sold the license
to Street Fighter to Capcom of America. Regardless, Capcom said
it and the plot guide has to go by Capcom's word in that respect that it
is the case NOW. It was not, however, the case in the past, as many
many MANY official sources stated otherwise. Of course, if all the
games are their own separate entities in terms of story, there wouldn't
be any point to the plot guide in the first place, so for the sake of
this guide having a point to existing, it will be pretending that all
the games are interconnected even though that isn't the case (it will
not, however, be denying that the games are separate any longer, though.
...I'm not going to go searching through the guide editting all past
statements to that effect though. That'll take forever). ...what
I'm wondering is why Capcom would tell Udon that Rival Schools is
supposedly set in the same universe as Street Fighter and then say
every Street Fighter game is within their own continuity and thus
universe. ...mweh.Possibly Capcom said it because Okamoto and Funamizu where gone by
then. Those two (responsible for a lot of SF's story and design)
were still with Capcom when SF2 Revival and Final Fight One were
made, so...Exact Quote:
Udoneko: Actually.... in the beginning, Capcom told me that EVERY GAME
is like a little alternate reality type of thing. So there is no real
history to the time line that they follow die hard. That is why when we
try to put together our comic story, we are taking elements from different
games that we beileve will best fit together in order to make a story that
make sense. Who met who, who dies, who lives.... those type of things....."Maybe Capcom simply treats canon really loosely. Miyamoto claims there
isn't a Mario canon either even though many of the games do have bits
and pieces that lead up to each other while also not following anything
super-strictly. It's not like Capcom following its own canon to a T
was ever claimed by the guide, anyways (quite the contrary. Look at
all the retcons Capcom is constantly taking). There's also Udon's
"In the beginning" remark, whatever that means.Of note is that there IS an official 'timeline' of sorts (IE, SFA3 taking
place 3 years before SF2 is official. Or was, last I checked), and for
there to be an official timeline would require all the games being in the
same continuity alone, really. That and... why the heck would Capcom
state in All About Capcom that Haggar stopped being mayor "2 years after
SFA3" if they weren't within the same continuity, anyways? Wouldn't they
use something like a Final Fight game to gauge the relativity of how many
years before or after a game Haggar stopped being mayor? Wouldn't it not
matter when Haggar stopped being mayor out of game if all the games were
separate continuities from each other anyways where Haggar could be mayor
in one set of continuities but not mayor in another? Haggar isn't even
MENTIONED in Street Fighter Alpha 3 for crying out loud, and yet Capcom
used that as their gauge for when he stopped being mayor.Seriously, how can the games not be connected at least loosely? I can
easily put together a little logic-based proof of that based on stuff
found within the games themselves.
And that doesn't answer my question, instead of quoting the plot guide, show me where it mentions ryu fought gill. I read the thing since 3.1. nowwhere does it mention ryu fighting gill at all.
Originally posted by shin_remy
Like i said don't do like youre the manI have read more story's then you. You don't know how many official story's they have had. What's with you attitude?
no and the Fight about Urien and Ken either. is whole different then i have readed.
Why are you doing so stupid of something like this. do you see somebody else do so stupid? making problems of nothing. You just can't stand that you haven't read everything. i know for sure that are also some other guys that have readen some stuff that you haven't readed and i either.
So Fu*king what. stop being annoying
Same as the Dbz vs Sf script. nobody has ever readed it. that was made up i think. but still you can't find it back
and i already had gaven a link what the site was. and that was 5 years back when i readed it
Originally posted by shin_remy
no and the Fight about Urien and Ken either. is whole different then i have readed.Why are you doing so stupid of something like this. do you see somebody else do so stupid? making problems of nothing. You just can't stand that you haven't read everything. i know for sure that are also some other guys that have readen some stuff that you haven't readed and i either.
So Fu*king what. stop being annoying
Same as the Dbz vs Sf script. nobody has ever readed it. that was made up i think. but still you can't find it back
and i already had gaven a link what the site was. and that was 5 years back when i readed it
Shin Remy, anyone can write crap on the internet. It's their sources that count, Your making claims and you want people to take your word for it. you don't even have a source,WTF?!