Top Ten Most Powerful

Anyway i'm not going to list any of the old wizards like the founders etc. cause we really don't know anything about them.
1. Voldemort - Dumbledore knows he can't defeat him
2. Dumbledore - He took out 4 powerful wizards in about a second
3. James Potter/Sirius - probobly equals
4. Snape
5. Bellatrix - got lucky with sirius, but probobly the most powerful death eater.
6. Moody - Legendary Auror
7. Dumbledore's Brother - If he's related to dumbledore he must be powerful.
8. McGonagal - old but still very powerful.
After these, the rest of the death eaters, Auros/Order members are of about the same ability. Harry has the potentila to be as powerful as Voldemort but has not nearly reached it yet. This is shown by the way Snape is able to toy with him.

7. Dumbledore's Brother - If he's related to dumbledore he must be powerful.

That doesn't make sense, after everything Rowling has referenced with regard to blood not making a difference, you can't say Dumbledore's brother must be powerful just because they're related. I'm not saying he isn't, but blood is NOT a guarantee.

Originally posted by Syren
7. Dumbledore's Brother - If he's related to dumbledore he must be powerful.

That doesn't make sense, after everything Rowling has referenced with regard to blood not making a difference, you can't say Dumbledore's brother must be powerful just because they're related. I'm not saying he isn't, but blood is NOT a guarantee.

True, but as you said, 'if he's related to Dumbledore he must be powerful', that was what I was arguing against 🙂

Originally posted by Syren
True, but as you said, 'if he's related to Dumbledore he must be powerful', that was what I was arguing against 🙂

Of course, I could also say I read you wrong 😛

Who must not be name!jmsorcerer

He Who Must Not Be Named.

You-Know-Who.

😛

People keep naming Grindelwald, who is dead. If dead people are aloud, then I think the four founders should be moderatly high on the list.

Originally posted by King Kandy
People keep naming Grindelwald, who is dead. If dead people are aloud, then I think the four founders should be moderatly high on the list.

Originally posted by Barker
Seem like if the any of the rest of the wizarding world was so powerful, we'd of heard of them.

Originally posted by Syren
No, she's Muggle-born. She's not a Muggle.

She's a witch who was born of Muggle parentage.

Argus Filch was born of magical parentage but he's not a wizard. He's known by the derogatory term of 'Squib', just as Hemione is known as 'Mudblood'. Just because Filch was born of a witch and wizard doesn't make him a wizard, as he cannot perform magic. Hermione has Muggle parents but she's most definitely a witch, and very talented at that.

Once you have the "Magic gene", it's and equal playing feild. all your other natural talents kick in, and you have a certain natural ability with magic.

The only thing that having muggle parents does islowers your propencity to have the "Magic gene".

wats magc gene

???

Would you mind trying to spell a tad better?

Half-Blood's have the highest potential actually.

Originally posted by King Kandy
I'd like to point out that there are many fewer Squibs then Muggle-borns, purely because the more wizards you have in your family, the more likely you are to have the "Magic gene".

Once you have the "Magic gene", it's and equal playing feild. all your other natural talents kick in, and you have a certain natural ability with magic.

The only thing that having muggle parents does islowers your propencity to have the "Magic gene".

'Magic gene'. Never was there a mention of this in the books.

My point was that Hermione is a witch. She's not a Muggle. She's not simply a Muggle who has a grasp on magic because she's intelligent. She's a witch. Why is there even an argument over this?

The fact that the girl can perform magic (in her case, bloody brilliantly) makes her a witch.

My comparison was simply to show that Filch's genes were filled with the potential for magic and yet he cannot perform even the simplest of spells. So he's more of a Muggle than Hermione will ever be.

Anyone not getting this? 😛

i think theres a chamber of gryffindor too since slytheren does .wat do u think?

Originally posted by ashle
i think theres a chamber of gryffindor too since slytheren does .wat do u think?

Originally posted by ashle
i think theres a chamber of gryffindor too since slytheren does .wat do u think?

Irrelevant now, even if it were on topic. The Chamber storyline's done and dusted.

How could you possibly say there is no magic gene? It's quite clear that the only ones who can do magic are those with the genetic propensity to do so.

And by what means are Half bloods the most powerful? Voldemort was one, and he was certainly powerful... But what else would lead you to this conclusion?