Originally posted by AlfheimNot quite... ❌ if you mean as in a girl selecting their partner, not as much, but if you mean whether or not is has an impact over intercourse overall for pain or pleasure than yes. Not saying all big is better, but that size matters. Or else there wouldn't be a "too big" or "too small".
Yeah I would think that if a girl was like kinda short and you had a big penis that would be a problem.
Thicker is preferred over longer btw.
OK i started reading this thread and some guys are just stupid. the average size for a penis i just 5 inches progressing to 5 and a half inches. the average depth a penis can be inserted is usually 6-8 inches in
Originally posted by Revan Souer
4 TO 7 INCHES ERECT i sorry feel for they 5% with penis under 1inch 😱
ergo 7 inches is 2 inches above average and is theoretically of ideal size.
Originally posted by Poo Face
I'm just speaking hypothetically. However, only a guy with a small penis would make a thread like this. 😉
i would be surprised if woman on this site (unless they are shallow) would suggest that size matters to the extent of happiness and in addition if every male says they are bigger than 6 inches.
Originally posted by cain marko
OK i started reading this thread and some guys are just stupid. the average size for a penis i just 5 inches progressing to 5 and a half inches. the average depth a penis can be inserted is usually 6-8 inches inergo 7 inches is 2 inches above average and is theoretically of ideal size.
nope insecurity like this is common in every man. this does not mean he has a small penis. media has supported the idea that women like larger penises without ever giving a size. this has lead men to believe that all women think like this and think that they are too small in their nether regions. truth is, women don't really mind as long as it is not abnormally small. even then its instinct for a women to feel rejective. Darwin suggested that sexual selection is how we got where we are today. and animals with features that attract mates (in the male of the human species case it is looks and length of penis-the later has only become more necessary in the past centuries unless evidence dates it further back) will get mates easier so theoretically females will only mate with well endowed males (rejecting the lesser sized males) thus down the generations the average penis length will continue to increase.
wait my train of thought is going ummmmmmmm..... oh yeah insecurity what i have said above means that most males will feel insecure about their size. but only a comment suggesting that a man is insecure shows true insecurity. The denial that they are 'large', if you will, forces them to hide behind mild mocking comments (like the quoted above) thus increasing insecurity in the recipient male.i would be surprised if woman on this site (unless they are shallow) would suggest that size matters to the extent of happiness and in addition if every male says they are bigger than 6 inches.
size to me does matter..if it's too big it aint going in
Originally posted by Tempest
size to me does matter..if it's too big it aint going in
obviously if too large in does matter. it is incompetent if to big which is the flaw in darwins theory. If penis size continues to grow then it could be inturn the extintion of the species( only because after about 12 inches it become unuseable)
Originally posted by cain markoBut selection would make it optimal for an ideal size to go in (another flaw since most men would be bred to ideal)... longer allows for more positions and girth gives better pressure on the walls. This isn't obviously more important than other attributes of character, but I hate when people contradict themselves by saying size doesn't matter and then saying something is too small or too big.
obviously if too large in does matter. it is incompetent if to big which is the flaw in darwins theory. If penis size continues to grow then it could be inturn the extintion of the species( only because after about 12 inches it become unuseable)
That's like saying weight doesn't matter, but there is a "too fat" or "too slim". You're right though.
How come people don't mention vagina sizes? Those are as equally as important or moreso because they can be controlled.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
But selection would make it optimal for an ideal size to go in (another flaw since most men would be bred to ideal)... longer allows for more positions and girth gives better pressure on the walls. This isn't obviously more important than other attributes of character, but I hate when people contradict themselves by saying size doesn't matter and then saying something is too small or too big.That's like saying weight doesn't matter, but there is a "too fat" or "too slim". You're right though.
How come people don't mention vagina sizes? Those are as equally as important or moreso because they can be controlled.
it was a accessory contradiction about a penis being too big because physically it can become too big and not work. my reference of it being too small is not my opinion it is Darwin's. if serious about reproduction the only necessity from a penis is that it work and that the male produces fertile semen. also i agree about the vaginal sizes. i gave an average above of the depth a penis usually go's but i am not too knowledgeable about vaginal sizes.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
My point wan't discussing them 😆 but that tighter was better, that can be controlled much easier as silver_tears mentioned.
Oh..sorry, I misunderstood. I mean, guys talk about a girl's boobs, but not her vagina.
I hate that word btw....it makes me think of Canadian bacon. 😕