Originally posted by Hwoarang
I can't be bothered. Allot of you are fanboys here because you overestimate your beloved and underestimate everyone else.
So you realized your favorite characater can't hold a candle to Ryu and all of a sudden I go to bed with Ryu's picture under my pillow? Is that how it works? I don't overestimate Ryu, not by a longshot. Quite in fact I've ridiculed his ass before in threads as Hayabusa vs Ryu and Link vs Ryu. If you want to meet real SF fanboys than by all means search those threads and meet the horror of true SF fanboys.
I disagrre trickster priest, tekken fighters are great h2h and should be able to compete with street fighter. The problem comes with the inconsistent feats that arise. I just lost all respect for kazuya and heiachi as fighters when they became jobbers. Apparantly in tekken, someone can train moderately for ten years and upsurp the entire hieracrhy.
Oh boyo....... Here we go yet again.....
Alright, whats happened this time? Howarang, I've noticed quite a number of spite threads come out of you, I read them, and I've noticed that each time, you've stipulated no Chi for the opponents of Tekken. Now I can understand that you want to bring other fighting games down to Tekken's level to try and make the matches more even. But you've gone about it all wrong. taking EXERY bit of fighting experience and every move or technique and tossing them out the window, plus denying the experience and training the SFers have gone through to get that far is ludicrous. You've basically just created new characters and given them the label of SFer.
You piss and moan about how SF Fanboys have said that SFer shits on everything else. I can pick about 6 insances where this is not the case right off the top of my head, and I'm sure if you look hard enough, you'll find frigging heaps. Instead of whining, why not try and LOOK for some Video game characters that can defeat the SFers on even terms, and then find someone whom Tekken can beat on even terms, no special stipulations, no bulshit rules, just a straight up slugfest, and I bet you'll gain the props of your peers here.
Originally posted by Superboy Prime
It's kind of funny; you claim I am a fanboy, and yet you fail to express why that is.
because you have 9 times out of ten sides with a SF character, and in my eyes you usually can see to accept a loss in some cases.
i don't see being a fanboy as a bad thing unless it total, which your definatly not.
heck i'l admit i'm a fanboy of: Sephiroth, Gouki, Squall, and pretty much all of the "big bads" from the games, i dunno why i just like then 😕
Originally posted by Emperor AshtarThank you. If people just admited that in H2H in actual fighting skill !! Tekken can comepete then Ill stop this. Nothing has shown me that SF are above Tekken in H2H.
I disagrre trickster priest, tekken fighters are great h2h and should be able to compete with street fighter. The problem comes with the inconsistent feats that arise. I just lost all respect for kazuya and heiachi as fighters when they became jobbers. Apparantly in tekken, someone can train moderately for ten years and upsurp the entire hieracrhy.
Its spite because they have to rely on theyre skill ? 😆
Fanboy.... 🙄
Originally posted by Kaled
because you have 9 times out of ten sides with a SF character, and in my eyes you usually can see to accept a loss in some cases.i don't see being a fanboy as a bad thing unless it total, which your definatly not.
heck i'l admit i'm a fanboy of: Sephiroth, Gouki, Squall, and pretty much all of the "big bads" from the games, i dunno why i just like then 😕
No problem with that, but I wasn't talking to you. 😛