sithsaber408
Intelligently Designed
Originally posted by systemshock2
Cosigned. X3 had the unfair advantage of having an already built in current audience. The last 2 X-movies were still very fresh to the general audience, and they considered them very good thanks to Singer ironically. Hence the huge opening weekend, which made up nearly half of its total domestic run. (But if you'll notice X3 left the theaters in around five or six weeks).On the other hand Superman's last movie came out in 1987, so the film wouldn't have had such a built in current audience. But unlike X3, and ironically just like Batman Begins, Superman Returns made over 75% of its total domestic run AFTER its opening weekend and stayed in theaters for over three months. Both attributes are a very good thing in Hollywood.
co-signed.
(since that seems to be all the rage around here nowadays.) 😛
I know that many people (die-hard Supes fans for the most part) had issues with Superman Returns, and that's fine, but it's a far cry to say that the film out-and-out "sucked."
I had just the opposite experience as some of the above posters, seeing the film with my wife, brother and sister in-law, and 3 of our close friends.
Every single one of us loved the film.
It was perfect, fitting in right after superman II as the next part of the story.
(apparently Newsweek, Time, Larry King, Entertainment Weekly, the New York Post, New York Daily News, Variety, Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Newsday, and Rolling Stone agreed with us.)
😄
Bring on teh sequel!