You know, I have done some reading on "Dumbledore is not dead", And I ran across this line: "fans are pointing to this clue to theorize that Dumbledore hasn't been Dumbledore for all of, or at least a great portion of, the book, and that the Dumbledore we see is someone using Polyjuice potion to pretend to be him, and therefore the real Dumbledore isn't dead."
So, if what he is suggesting, about snape helping DD with some "master plan" is true, then maybe snape is more loyal to DD than voldy. My point is that maybe snape took polyjuice potion to transform into DD, then vice versa. Just a stab in the dark
I tried to start a thread with this, but I forgot to search for it. Anyway, this is kinda long, but oh well.
If you read carefully in the 6th book, It says that Snape and Dumbledore are arguing. I think that Dumbledore was telling Snape to kill him, but Snape didnt want to. also think that Snape said he would not do it, and when Dumbledore was pleading to him in the tower, he was pleading Snape to kill him. I also think that before he died, he made a horcrux. I think that horcrux is Fawkes, because Dumbledore said you could make animals horcruxes.
I also think that I figured out what J.K. Rowling was talking about when she said that Harry looking just like his dad, but with his mothers eyes. She said that is very significant in the last book. In the third book, Lupin told Harry that His mother helped him out in his time of need. The only time of need lupin would have would be his werewolf transformation. I think that Lily was an animagus and her mark was her green eyes. I f you think about it, no other animaguses besides James had kids, and James being an animagus did have an efeect on Harry, his Patronus form. I think Lily passed the Animagus ability on because Harry has the same eyes as Lily.
here is a way to contact JK:
J. K. Rowling
c/o Scholastic Inc.
555 Broadway
New York, NY 10012
or
J. K. Rowling
c/o Bloomsbury Publishing
38 Soho Square
London
W1V 5DF
UK
if lost, it can be viewed at: http://www.mugglenet.com/jkr/contact.shtml
(PS: you should go to mugglenet some, it gives a lot of info, so consider it. [not an ad] To all who dont know, the 5th HP movie comes out 7-13-07, as confirmed by Warner Bros. inc.)
Maybe he will die
Possibilities
1.)he starts a war and he dies but also beats voldermort
(but remeber when him and voldermort clashed harry loked to be stronger but is portrayed to be angry in the 5 and and most in the and whinney n the 6 but happy at the end of it)
2.)he beats voldermort but ron or hermonie might die but hopefully not cuz i would cry so much
I think J.K is gonna suprise us all and no one will no whats comming!!! 😕
GOOD THINKEN
Originally posted by lino111
wait a minute. if pictures really have some sort of a soul, then why did not dumbledores picture do anything. maybe he is alive.
just a thought.
That makes alot of since cuz in the first book harry asked ron where DD had went to and ron said why would he stay there all day
so if the pics had soul they wouldnt move anymore or disapear if he weere really dead
OMG
Originally posted by PhoenixSpoiler:
no I reckon voldie used the death of harry's parents to cement the spell. slughorn said that living creatures didn't make good horcruxes, but maybe voldie wants to be clever, putting it in the one place he knows no one would ever bring themself to destroy. SO, in order to destroy voldie, harry has to kill himself...
I don't think Voldemort has a horcrux in Harry. In book five Dumbledore said that Voldemort tried to posses Harry but voldemort couldn't stay in him for long because Harry was full of the the thing that hurts Voldemort most.........Love.
As for book 7 I'm 99.99999% sure Dumbledore and Snape planned his death and I'm 50/50 as to if Dumbledore is still alive.
Originally posted by steverules
I'm wondering if his death was faked
I'm not sure it's DD's death, but I'm pretty sure SOMEONE'S death was or will be faked. There's just something funny about the mentioning the draught of living death, and also DD telling Draco they can fake his death. Too much of a coincidence to me. Like I said, someones death has been or will be faked in book 7 in my opinion. ✅
news update:
for those of you who dont know, the 7th book comes out sometime in the summer of '07 (as stated by JKR).
The rumor that the 7th book will be called "Harry Potter and the Green Flame Torch" has been squashed.
Thats it for the news, so here comes the theory:
Dumbledore is dead, but as he always told Voldemort, "there are things worse than death." i think that has segnificance.
and :
unless neville played an imprtant role in book 6, he has one in book 7 (JKR hinted this in the FAQ's section of her site)
thats all for now 🙂
It is said that the question 'why did dumbledore have james' cloak on the night he was murdered, even though dumbledore can go invisible without it?' is very important. Could dumbledore have been at the Potter's house on the night that they were murdered? If so, why? Why couldn't he have prevented their deaths? I know this sounds crazy, but do you think dumbledore knew what was going to happen? Where was dumbledore on the night of the potter's deaths? He is possibly the most powerful wizard ever, yet he wasn't able to come to the aid of two members of the order ( James and Lily). Why?
This is just a speculation. What do you guys think? 😕
Re: NEWBIE ALERT!! NEWBIE W/VALID SPECULATIONS!!!!
Originally posted by Whorecrux
ok...i'm totally new to the site, but...not to HP. that being said, i offer forth the following speculations:Severus Snape is NOT a Death Eater.
i know, i know, what the **** am i thinking; he got Sirius whacked, he offed Dumbledore. Hear me out.
1)In Sorcerer's Stone, he repeatedly saved Harry's life. Disregard his explanation from Chapter 2 of Half-Blood Prince; it doesn't pan out logically. "I stopped the Dark Lord because he was possessed by a greedy weakling?" let's be real.
2)He taught Harry Occlumency.
3)He showed Cornelius Fudge his Dark Mark when fudge was the Minister of Magic. ballsy.
4)The Order was always more well-informed than the Death Eaters; meaning Snape wasn't really putting his heart into spying for Voldemort; meaning he's on Harry's side.
5)He tried to help save Sirius, and Harry. Note that he took Harry's cryptic message about Padfoot being in the place it's hidden straight to the Order and informed that at once...plus he went to look for Harry in the Forbidden Forest, ALONE, when he realized what Harry had done.
6)he slipped Umbridge the fake Veritaserum to help Harry.
7)he was as amazed at Barty Crouch Jr.'s resurfacing as anyone. not to mention ahd no clue crouch was robbing him. if he thought Snape still a Death eater, wouldn't Barty Crouch, whom Voldemort repeatedly acknowledges as his most faithful DE ever in Goblet of Fire, have told him the plan and procured help the easy way?
8)he didn't punish Karkaroff personally for fleeing; even encouraged it; NOT actions of Voldemort's right hand.
9)he let Harry get away with the Half-Blood Prince's book w/o confiscating it.
10)he lied to Umbridge rather than reveal Sirius's wherabouts.
11)he always had a potion ready to cure Dumbledore or anyone else if needed.
12)Voldemort himself knew that there was a traitor in the Death Eaters, and who it was. This was not Legilimency; it was basic deduction from information gathered by Wormtail and Crouch Jr. and delivered to the Dark Lord.
13)and the grand capper: if you follow the book VERY closely; didn't something seem out of place? Dumbledore knew about Draco Malfoy...and about Snape's meetings with him...he and Snape often shared the same Pensieve...Dumbledore was an even more accomplished Legilimens than even Voldemort...anyways, to the point. Dumbledore was old, wounded, poisoned, and dying, and he knew it. After getting and destroying the second Horcrux, he pretty well knew he was finished. And he knew full well what Draco was up to; He only asked to humor him, to make him proud, to show him what he could acoomplish once Dumbledore decided to pop the question about switching sides. Now isn't it likely that Snape and Dumbledore had a secret plan? Dumbledore took Harry away to assure his safety; Snape told Draco to go ahead with whatever he was going to do; then Snape ran along once "alerted" and "joined" his "fellow" Death Eaters. but didn't you notice how he never threatened the Unbreakable Vow he made? never tried to hurt Malfoy OR Harry? in fact, made DAMN SURE that NO ONE hurt Harry in the fray? how he seemed to be guiding Malfoy...speaking of, Dumbledore was disarmed way too easily by Malfoy. almost HAD to've been staged. all he would've had to do was a little "Accio wand!" and Draco would've been ****ed.and Dumbledore begging Snape for mercy....lot of people have told me how they don't feel that makes sense. of course it doesn't, you hyena's ass. he wasn't begging for mercy; he was begging Snape to release him, to finish him, and to guide and protect Draco and Harry and try to unite them against Voldemort. Come to think of it...WHY were people whom Snape had had no formal contact with for almost 15 years so terrified of him at once glance when he first came out to see Dumbledore defenseless? no, no, not because he was Voldemort's golden boy; everyone knows that each man is as expendable as the next to Mr. Riddle dependent upon his or her current status and reliability. they feared him 'cause they didn't trust him. not to mention, if you think there's a flaw in my argument, i bring you my triumphant finale: Snape walked out of the front door with a full plan in mind. No way he could've unless everything was preordained. c'mon, if Flitwick had JUST inofrmed him there were Death Eaters, would his first instinct have been to go and find Malfoy, whom he already KNEW to be there, and Dumbledore? or to fight what was at hand, threatening the students? no, no, it was Dumbledore's Last Set-up. I think Book 7 will prove once and for all how vital Snape is to Harry's success. (Oh and let's not forget he dropped Harry that little clue about "keeping his mouth shut and his mind closed"😉...oh and one more bit to add...Snape WOULD be the perfect successor to Dumbledore. He hates Voldemort, and he is, behind Voldemort, the greatest wizard still living at the end of Half Blood Prince. What other "Death Eater" had such success in blocking Harry's spells and stymying him outright? Harry thwarted all the others.
ne ways, that's the end of that theory.
on to theory number 2:
the initials R.A.B. on the fake Horcrux:
personally, i'm inclined to believe those are the initials of Sirius's brother, Regulus Black. why? simple. One, Order of the Phoenix describes a heavy locket that no one could open sitting around in the Black family house on Grimmauld Place. the real Horcrux, as well as the fake, were lockets. perfect switch, right? two, No other character mentioned in the series seems to match the initials, except Hermione's unceremoniously dismissed assumptions of Bungs and Axebanger. Three, we know Regulus was killed for trying to leave the Death Eaters. What if that was his reason? Maybe, like his parents, he became a little less convinced of Voldemort's stability upon learning of what lengths his Lord would go to for power. Mayhap he even tried to acquire information to those links. mayhap he succeeded, as well. And Mayhap he was murdered not for trying to leave the Death Eaters, but because a livid and terrified Voldemort discovered that regulus knewso much...even if he never found out WHAT, specifically, regulus knew, or that he had stolen a horcrux. the only missing piece of the puzzle to back this claim is not knowing for sure what Regulus Black's middle name, or at least initial, is.
2 other possibilites: Borgin, whose first and middle names have not yet been revealed, and we know had many dealings with a young Tom Riddle and could possibly have began trailing him and finding out what he was up to;
OR
3)the not-unlikely possibility that Rowling is going to introduce one more brand-new character into the series in the closing volume.
and speculative topic number THREE!
the Horcruxes
we know Tom Riddle's diary is destroyed
we know the Gaunt family ring is destroyed
*the locket of Salazar Slytherin MAY be destroyed; the cryptic note within the fake Horcrux indicates as muchand of course; the final 3 Horcruxes
all of them seem to have been found in places that meant something significant to Tom Marvolo Riddle, pre-Lord Voldemort, so:
1)Helga Hufflepuff's cup:
2)Nagini
3)an unknown object; although whatever it is probably belonged either to Godric Gryffindor or Rowena Ravenclawsuspicions:
the Gaunt ring was found in the Gaunt family home
Tom's diary was first entrusted to Lucius Malfoy, then shipped to Hogwarts
Merope gaunt's locket was found, as was the fake Horcrux left behind, in the cave where young Tom Riddle tortured his fellow orphanage residentsideas...
i think one is in Borgin & Burke's. sue me.
we know Nagini never leaves Voldemort's side; which is going to make her the most difficult Horcrux to destroy, plus make her destroyer's intentions rather obvious if Voldemort catches Harry doing it
my guess for the final Horcrux would have to be...believe it or not...the bedroom that Tom Riddle slept in at the orphange he grew up in.~p.s.~ incidentally, what's with this "harry has to die to kill voldemort 'cause voldemort took his blood" bullshit? personally, i think Dumbledore's "look of triumph" from Goblet of Fire was about him knowing that good ol' Tom Riddle made his first real crucial mistake in assuming that Lily's protection could carry over to him. Wouldn't Harry's blood weaken Voldemort since he can't comprehend love, the emotion which causes him physical damage? i think Harry's blood will be his one great weakness and determine the outcome
Ok, that and the following post rendered me speechless clapping
I agree with everything you've put forward and, well, wow 😄