I 100% agree
I think its such a silly thing to add Jack as a spanner in the works. Its so unrealistic to do that with such a popular a main character(who is in fact the money of the movie) and the lead female
Will Turner is not why this movie sells..So its not like a Harry Potter deal..with Ron/Hermione
and this is not a story we already know the end to like phantom of the opera, Romeo and Juliet or Titanic..we know that the main and most loved character will or might possibly lose the main girl so it softens the blow.
IMO Will is not even needed in the story for it to be successful..he wasnt even needed in movie 1 ..but they had to add him cuz Jack was a rather large risk.
You can see them slightly miliking the Jack/Liz potential even with that movie(the chemistry is more interesting...but sadly they couldnt head that way..BACK THEN that is
but why not keep the door open?..
but instead of making it too obvious..they cut out much of the J/E suggestivness because it would make Will look all the more pointless as a character..