Is Wikipedia reliable?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Also zoophilia and bestiality are not synonyms.

Speaking...mmmfff...speaking from....mmmfffff...hehe....speaking from experience?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Also zoophilia and bestiality are not synonyms.

Whats the difference?

The former is a paraphilia, the latter a sexual activity. Ironically even wikipedia notes this. However it then contradicts itself using the term zoophilia to refer to bestiality - which probably doesn't say much for its reliability.

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Speaking...mmmfff...speaking from....mmmfffff...hehe....speaking from experience?

Usually the info on Wiki is pretty accurate. Seldomly its not, but if its not then its usually corrected. Its a good place to quickly find out information on a particular subject, just don't be footnoting Wikipedia anytime soon...its not a scholarly source.

Is anyone els here an editor at Wikipedia?

I edit articles on Wikipedia, but never to add stuff, because if I know something it's usually already there. So I do technical stuff like grammar and writing the codes for tables and shit like that.