Is the Bible missing stuff?

Started by Nellinator2 pages

Originally posted by Strangelove
If certain books are to be believed, then the Bible is missing a couple Gospels too

Definitely not. The New Testament is missing nothing. The Gnostic Gospels are definitely not canon.

Ya, they are missing things that aren't Gnostic.

Originally posted by Gregory
The Vedas are probably older then the Bible. Do you have a point you're trying to make?
My point being, the bible had to come from another source. It's not the oldest holy book on the planet and man have believed in god before the bible was introduced to them. The Hebrews were not the first to aknowledge that there was a god, and being they are the authors of the old testament. That means the concept of a higher being came from else where. The oldest holy book on the planet I would say is the "Book of the coming forth by day and by night". It was the first book on record made by man, with regards to a higher being as the creator of man. It was written 3,400 yrs before the old testament and 4,200 yrs before the new testament.

Originally posted by heru
My point being, the bible had to come from another source. It's not the oldest holy book on the planet and man have believed in god before the bible was introduced to them. The Hebrews were not the first to aknowledge that there was a god, and being they are the authors of the old testament. That means the concept of a higher being came from else where. The oldest holy book on the planet I would say is the "Book of the coming forth by day and by night". It was the first book on record made by man, with regards to a higher being as the creator of man. It was written 3,400 yrs before the old testament and 4,200 yrs before the new testament.

The Bible has been heavenly influenced by Zoroastrianism, Greek, Persian, And Egyptian mythos.

Check out my thread "Christian Mythology" for more details.

Originally posted by Nellinator
Definitely not. The New Testament is missing nothing. The Gnostic Gospels are definitely not canon.
the definition of 'canon' is "universally accepted"; and the gnostic gospels aren't canon because the Church doesn't want it to be

The bible is missing stuff !? Nooooooo..... SERIOUSLY ?

P.S: not intended as an offense.

The bible is missing lots of books......The cannon is lacking.

Thats because its cannon...a gross oversimplification fed to the masses.