Man gets 508 years for sex assaults on kids

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Because it's not our responsibility or right to get rid of them, because it costs a lot more, because it's hypocritical.

Who is "our" referring to?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It can't happen with 100, it can't happen if you just keep them in there for life. 508 years just sounds like a South Park episode.

That quote you're referring to wasn't by me.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Because if they sentence him to death, he's going to appeal up the ass, keeping the attorneys and judges paid and sucking taxpayer's dollars away

I know all that, I still think he should just be shot.

Only 508 years? That's crazy! He should get at least 527 years! God our legal system is broken, wtf!

Originally posted by BackFire
Only 508 years? That's crazy! He should get at least 527 years! God our legal system is broken, wtf!

According to wal-mart, bullets are only 20 cents a pop. (no pun intended) It's hard to debate the cost after you see figures like that.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
According to wal-mart, bullets are only 20 cents a pop. (no pun intended) It's hard to debate the cost after you see figures like that.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Bastard deserves more.

I'm glad he'll spend the rest of his life as another man's ***** in prison. Castration would solve the problem and be a lot less expensive.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
According to wal-mart, bullets are only 20 cents a pop. (no pun intended) It's hard to debate the cost after you see figures like that.

*Sigh*
I guess this thread has developed into an analysis of our legal system.
First noone gets "life"
Its at least 20 to life and I don't think what he was charged with comes with a life sentance. The massive amount of years is based on how many counts of sexual assault on a minor he was charged with. Every charge comes with an amount of time to be served attached to it. take that, multiply by how many charges= years to be served.
And the one year earlier, I'll bet they didn't have enough on him for the other stuff to work well, and so they cut a deal.

Is it just me or does Zuri-Kye McGhee kind of look like Wacko Jacko. ermm

does that break any kind of record?

Originally posted by bogen
does that break any kind of record?

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
True, but that's not the point. Why keep scum like that alive?; that's the point.

Cause it's cheaper?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
To everyone saying: "Why can't it just be life?".

Because it involves little children. If a man got 508 years for 25 murders, there wouldn't be anywhere near as much vigour put into applauding it, despite a life actually being ended.

It can't happen with 100, it can't happen if you just keep them in there for life. 508 years just sounds like a South Park episode.

Because it's not our responsibility or right to get rid of them, because it costs a lot more, because it's hypocritical.

-AC

Actually, if convicted on 25 counts of murder he would most likely have gotten the death penalty, you can decide for yourself which is worse, death or 508 (a true life term) years in prison. Regardless, 25 counts of murder would equate to several hundred years if no death penaly existed.

That's not the point, 508 isn't for one charge, it is the accumulative of the time he received for each of his 65 charges. Just how it works.

I take it you're against the death penalty when stating "not our responsibility or right"? Why is it hypocritical though?

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Man gets 508 years for sex assaults on kids

CENTENNIAL, Colo. (AP) — A 32-year-old man convicted of using his youthful looks to befriend and sexually assault teens was sentenced to 508 years in prison Monday.

Authorities said Zuri-Kye McGhee targeted 18 boys and one girl between ages 13 and 15. His 54-year-old mother is accused of helping him in some cases by introducing him to families with young children, and she is scheduled to stand trial in February.

He was convicted in August of 63 counts, including sexual assault on a child with a pattern of abuse. McGhee’s lawyer, deputy public defender James O’Connor, did not immediately return a call.

"The district attorney’s office is very pleased with this sentence, as our goal was to keep Mr. McGhee away from children for the rest of his life," district attorney’s spokeswoman Kathleen Walsh said.

Walsh said the judge also ordered McGhee, who lived in the Denver suburb of Aurora, to pay US$9,556 in restitution and designated him a sexually violent predator.

In 1998, Zuri-Kye McGhee was charged with 23 counts of criminal sexual contact with a minor. He served 321 days in jail after pleading guilty to contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

[b]508 Years! 😆

vincent
[/B]

serves him right. 😐

may God forgive him.

Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
serves him right. 😐

may God forgive him.

Originally posted by JaehSkywalker
serves him right. 😐

may God forgive him.

May God forgive him.

Originally posted by Robtard
Actually, if convicted on 25 counts of murder he would most likely have gotten the death penalty, you can decide for yourself which is worse, death or 508 (a true life term) years in prison. Regardless, 25 counts of murder would equate to several hundred years if no death penaly existed.

That's not the point, 508 isn't for one charge, it is the accumulative of the time he received for each of his 65 charges. Just how it works.

I take it you're against the death penalty when stating "not our responsibility or right"? Why is it hypocritical though?

Killing someone because they killed someone is hypocritical.

Of course so is locking up someone, but you can't deny the hypocrisy.

so how do you propose he gets punished?